linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v1] ufs: poll HCS.UCRDY before issuing a UIC command

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <991cac52-22bc-0150-4332-76ac044c5bcb@quicinc.com>
Date:   Wed, 10 May 2023 14:24:51 -0700
From:   "Bao D. Nguyen" <quic_nguyenb@...cinc.com>
To:     Kiwoong Kim <kwmad.kim@...sung.com>, <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
        <avri.altman@....com>, <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
        <martin.petersen@...cle.com>, <beanhuo@...ron.com>,
        <adrian.hunter@...el.com>, <sc.suh@...sung.com>,
        <hy50.seo@...sung.com>, <sh425.lee@...sung.com>,
        <kwangwon.min@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1] ufs: poll HCS.UCRDY before issuing a UIC command

On 5/9/2023 1:24 AM, Kiwoong Kim wrote:
> With auto hibern8 enabled, UIC could be working
> for a while to process a hibern8 operation and HCI
> reports UIC not ready for a short term through HCS.UCRDY.
> And UFS driver can't recognize the operation.
> UFSHCI spec specifies UCRDY like this:
> whether the host controller is ready to process UIC COMMAND
> 
> The 'ready' could be seen as many different meanings. If the meaning
> includes not processing any request from HCI, processing a hibern8
> operation can be 'not ready'. In this situation, the driver needs to
> wait until the operations is completed.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kiwoong Kim <kwmad.kim@...sung.com>
> ---
>   drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c | 13 ++++++++++++-
>   1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
> index 96ce6af..fc79539 100644
> --- a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
> +++ b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
> @@ -2368,7 +2368,18 @@ static inline int ufshcd_hba_capabilities(struct ufs_hba *hba)
>    */
>   static inline bool ufshcd_ready_for_uic_cmd(struct ufs_hba *hba)
>   {
> -	return ufshcd_readl(hba, REG_CONTROLLER_STATUS) & UIC_COMMAND_READY;
> +	ktime_t timeout = ktime_add_ms(ktime_get(), UIC_CMD_TIMEOUT);
> +	u32 val = 0;
> +
> +	do {
> +		val = ufshcd_readl(hba, REG_CONTROLLER_STATUS) &
> +			UIC_COMMAND_READY;
> +		if (val)
> +			break;
> +		usleep_range(500, 1000);
Hi Kiwoong,
It looks like you are sleeping while holding the 
spin_lock_irqsave(hba->host->host_lock, flags)
in ufshcd_send_uic_cmd()?


> +	} while (ktime_before(ktime_get(), timeout));
> +
> +	return val ? true : false;
>   }
>   
>   /**