linux-kernel - Situation of CONFIG_CLK_SUNXI_PRCM

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 10 May 2023 07:38:04 +0200
From:   Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com>
To:     Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
        Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>,
        Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org>,
        linux-sunxi@...ts.linux.dev, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel-janitors <kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Situation of CONFIG_CLK_SUNXI_PRCM_SUN9I

Dear Maxime,

with commit 49c726d55c1b ("clk: sunxi: Add Kconfig options"), you
introduce various build configurations for Legacy clock support for
Allwinner SoCs. Among them, you introduce the config
CLK_SUNXI_PRCM_SUN9I in drivers/clk/sunxi/Kconfig, but this config is
not used anywhere in the kernel tree.

Can we just delete this config CLK_SUNXI_PRCM_SUN9I again, as it is
not needed, or did you simply miss to adjust the Makefile for this
option to be effective?

I will gladly send a patch, once you could give me a quick pointer.

Best regards,

Lukas

Note: This is a resent email (see original email:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAKXUXMzqCktKz7vGN4_QAp4n1SeP0-YHL19evmVSfseZOemd5g@mail.gmail.com/);
now hopefully with an email address for Maxime that reaches Maxime.