[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230510053832.438529-3-davidgow@google.com>
Date: Wed, 10 May 2023 13:38:31 +0800
From: David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>
To: Benjamin Berg <benjamin@...solutions.net>,
Brendan Higgins <brendan.higgins@...ux.dev>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>,
Rae Moar <rmoar@...gle.com>,
Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com>
Cc: David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>, maxime@...no.tech,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, kunit-dev@...glegroups.com,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Sadiya Kazi <sadiyakazi@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 3/4] Documentation: kunit: Warn that exit functions run
even if init fails
KUnit's exit functions will run even if the corresponding init function
fails. It's easy, when writing an exit function, to assume the init
function succeeded, and (for example) access uninitialised memory or
dereference NULL pointers.
Note that this case exists and should be handled in the documentation.
Suggested-by: Benjamin Berg <benjamin@...solutions.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/a39af0400abedb2e9b31d84c37551cecc3eed0e1.camel@sipsolutions.net/
Reviewed-by: Sadiya Kazi <sadiyakazi@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>
---
Changes since v3:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20230421040218.2156548-3-davidgow@google.com/
- Fix a spelling error (thanks, Sadiya)
- Add Reviewed-by tag.
No changes since v2:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20230419085426.1671703-3-davidgow@google.com/
This patch was introduced in v2.
---
Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst | 12 ++++++++++--
include/kunit/test.h | 3 +++
2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst
index 9f720f1317d3..46957d1cbcbb 100644
--- a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst
+++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst
@@ -166,7 +166,12 @@ many similar tests. In order to reduce duplication in these closely related
tests, most unit testing frameworks (including KUnit) provide the concept of a
*test suite*. A test suite is a collection of test cases for a unit of code
with optional setup and teardown functions that run before/after the whole
-suite and/or every test case. For example:
+suite and/or every test case.
+
+.. note::
+ A test case will only run if it is associated with a test suite.
+
+For example:
.. code-block:: c
@@ -196,7 +201,10 @@ after everything else. ``kunit_test_suite(example_test_suite)`` registers the
test suite with the KUnit test framework.
.. note::
- A test case will only run if it is associated with a test suite.
+ The ``exit`` and ``suite_exit`` functions will run even if ``init`` or
+ ``suite_init`` fail. Make sure that they can handle any inconsistent
+ state which may result from ``init`` or ``suite_init`` encountering errors
+ or exiting early.
``kunit_test_suite(...)`` is a macro which tells the linker to put the
specified test suite in a special linker section so that it can be run by KUnit
diff --git a/include/kunit/test.h b/include/kunit/test.h
index 57b309c6ca27..3028a1a3fcad 100644
--- a/include/kunit/test.h
+++ b/include/kunit/test.h
@@ -168,6 +168,9 @@ static inline char *kunit_status_to_ok_not_ok(enum kunit_status status)
* test case, similar to the notion of a *test fixture* or a *test class*
* in other unit testing frameworks like JUnit or Googletest.
*
+ * Note that @exit and @suite_exit will run even if @init or @suite_init
+ * fail: make sure they can handle any inconsistent state which may result.
+ *
* Every &struct kunit_case must be associated with a kunit_suite for KUnit
* to run it.
*/
--
2.40.1.521.gf1e218fcd8-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists