[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <A8647EF5-566A-4B99-9020-772810CB2BF7@cutebit.org>
Date: Wed, 10 May 2023 09:30:12 +0200
From: Martin Povišer <povik+lin@...ebit.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Andrew Davis <afd@...com>,
Shi Fu <shifu0704@...ndersoft.com>,
Shenghao Ding <shenghao-ding@...com>, kevin-lu@...com,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, asahi@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: dt-bindings: Adjust #sound-dai-cells on TI's
single-DAI codecs
> On 10. 5. 2023, at 9:17, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> On 09/05/2023 17:34, Martin Povišer wrote:
>> A bunch of TI's codecs have binding schemas which force #sound-dai-cells
>> to one despite those codecs only having a single DAI. Allow for bindings
>> with zero DAI cells and deprecate the former non-zero value.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Martin Povišer <povik+lin@...ebit.org>
>> ---
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/tas2562.yaml | 6 ++++--
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/tas2770.yaml | 6 ++++--
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/tas27xx.yaml | 6 ++++--
>> 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/tas2562.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/tas2562.yaml
>> index a5bb561bfcfb..31a3024ea789 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/tas2562.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/tas2562.yaml
>> @@ -55,7 +55,9 @@ properties:
>> description: TDM TX current sense time slot.
>>
>> '#sound-dai-cells':
>> - const: 1
>> + # The codec has a single DAI, the #sound-dai-cells=<1>; case is left in for backward
>> + # compatibility but is deprecated.
>> + enum: [0, 1]
>
> Does it? I see playback and capture.
I think so. Playback and capture are not separate DAIs.
Martin
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists