[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <F12DE31C-E167-47F0-BAE0-C09538C5C3C8@cutebit.org>
Date: Wed, 10 May 2023 09:33:47 +0200
From: Martin Povišer <povik+lin@...ebit.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Andrew Davis <afd@...com>,
Shi Fu <shifu0704@...ndersoft.com>,
Shenghao Ding <shenghao-ding@...com>, kevin-lu@...com,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, asahi@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: dt-bindings: Adjust #sound-dai-cells on TI's
single-DAI codecs
> On 10. 5. 2023, at 9:30, Martin Povišer <povik+lin@...ebit.org> wrote:
>
>> On 10. 5. 2023, at 9:17, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org> wrote:
>>
>> On 09/05/2023 17:34, Martin Povišer wrote:
>>> A bunch of TI's codecs have binding schemas which force #sound-dai-cells
>>> to one despite those codecs only having a single DAI. Allow for bindings
>>> with zero DAI cells and deprecate the former non-zero value.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Martin Povišer <povik+lin@...ebit.org>
>>> ---
>>> '#sound-dai-cells':
>>> - const: 1
>>> + # The codec has a single DAI, the #sound-dai-cells=<1>; case is left in for backward
>>> + # compatibility but is deprecated.
>>> + enum: [0, 1]
>>
>> Does it? I see playback and capture.
>
> I think so. Playback and capture are not separate DAIs.
>
> Martin
I double checked, I am pretty sure. There’s a single snd_soc_dai_driver,
which becomes a single DAI.
Martin
>
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Krzysztof
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists