[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ff0a7628-b9e2-d5f5-cb1e-678ea25ec1cb@quicinc.com>
Date: Wed, 10 May 2023 21:42:01 -0700
From: Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
Kuogee Hsieh <quic_khsieh@...cinc.com>,
<dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>, <robdclark@...il.com>,
<sean@...rly.run>, <swboyd@...omium.org>, <dianders@...omium.org>,
<vkoul@...nel.org>, <daniel@...ll.ch>, <airlied@...il.com>,
<agross@...nel.org>, <andersson@...nel.org>
CC: <quic_jesszhan@...cinc.com>, <quic_sbillaka@...cinc.com>,
<marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>, <freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
<linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/8] drm/msm/dpu: add DPU_PINGPONG_DSC feature bit for
DPU < 7.0.0
On 5/10/2023 9:39 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On 11/05/2023 07:38, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 5/10/2023 9:29 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>>> On 11/05/2023 01:07, Kuogee Hsieh wrote:
>>>> DPU < 7.0.0 requires the PINGPONG block to be involved during
>>>> DSC setting up. Since DPU >= 7.0.0, enabling and starting the DSC
>>>> encoder engine moved to INTF with the help of the flush mechanism.
>>>
>>> Nit: was moved.
>>>
>>>> Add a DPU_PINGPONG_DSC feature bit to restrict the availability of
>>>> dpu_hw_pp_setup_dsc() and dpu_hw_pp_dsc_{enable,disable}() on the
>>>> PINGPONG block to DPU < 7.0.0 hardware, as the registers are not
>>>> available [in the PINGPONG block] on DPU 7.0.0 and higher anymore.
>>>
>>> this looks good
>>>
>>>> Existing call-sites to these callbacks already skip calling into
>>>> them if the function pointer is NULL.
>>>
>>> This is more relevant for patch 3 commit message.
>>>
>>>> Add DPU_PINGPONG_DSC feature
>>>> bit to all chipset with DPU < 7.0.0.
>>>
>>> This is incorrect, as we do not change the catalog in this patch.
>>>
>>
>> Sorry but why not? The changes done to dpu_hw_catalog.c do exactly that.
>
> Because the patch does not add this feature bit to any of the chipsets.
> I think the relevant patch was lost somewhere during the rework/rebase.
>
>
>
This is adding it right?
#define PINGPONG_SDM845_MASK \
- (BIT(DPU_PINGPONG_DITHER) | BIT(DPU_PINGPONG_TE))
+ (BIT(DPU_PINGPONG_DITHER) | BIT(DPU_PINGPONG_TE) |
BIT(DPU_PINGPONG_DSC))
#define PINGPONG_SDM845_TE2_MASK \
Powered by blists - more mailing lists