[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <575d9fb6-15c4-1faf-8457-c5ae3f99895c@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 11 May 2023 07:49:29 +0300
From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
To: Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com>,
Kuogee Hsieh <quic_khsieh@...cinc.com>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, robdclark@...il.com,
sean@...rly.run, swboyd@...omium.org, dianders@...omium.org,
vkoul@...nel.org, daniel@...ll.ch, airlied@...il.com,
agross@...nel.org, andersson@...nel.org
Cc: quic_jesszhan@...cinc.com, quic_sbillaka@...cinc.com,
marijn.suijten@...ainline.org, freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/8] drm/msm/dpu: add DPU_PINGPONG_DSC feature bit for
DPU < 7.0.0
On 11/05/2023 07:42, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
>
>
> On 5/10/2023 9:39 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>> On 11/05/2023 07:38, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 5/10/2023 9:29 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>>>> On 11/05/2023 01:07, Kuogee Hsieh wrote:
>>>>> DPU < 7.0.0 requires the PINGPONG block to be involved during
>>>>> DSC setting up. Since DPU >= 7.0.0, enabling and starting the DSC
>>>>> encoder engine moved to INTF with the help of the flush mechanism.
>>>>
>>>> Nit: was moved.
>>>>
>>>>> Add a DPU_PINGPONG_DSC feature bit to restrict the availability of
>>>>> dpu_hw_pp_setup_dsc() and dpu_hw_pp_dsc_{enable,disable}() on the
>>>>> PINGPONG block to DPU < 7.0.0 hardware, as the registers are not
>>>>> available [in the PINGPONG block] on DPU 7.0.0 and higher anymore.
>>>>
>>>> this looks good
>>>>
>>>>> Existing call-sites to these callbacks already skip calling into
>>>>> them if the function pointer is NULL.
>>>>
>>>> This is more relevant for patch 3 commit message.
>>>>
>>>>> Add DPU_PINGPONG_DSC feature
>>>>> bit to all chipset with DPU < 7.0.0.
>>>>
>>>> This is incorrect, as we do not change the catalog in this patch.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Sorry but why not? The changes done to dpu_hw_catalog.c do exactly that.
>>
>> Because the patch does not add this feature bit to any of the
>> chipsets. I think the relevant patch was lost somewhere during the
>> rework/rebase.
>>
>>
>>
>
> This is adding it right?
>
> #define PINGPONG_SDM845_MASK \
> - (BIT(DPU_PINGPONG_DITHER) | BIT(DPU_PINGPONG_TE))
> + (BIT(DPU_PINGPONG_DITHER) | BIT(DPU_PINGPONG_TE) |
> BIT(DPU_PINGPONG_DSC))
> #define PINGPONG_SDM845_TE2_MASK \
Ah, I see now. I was expecting changes to the actual catlog files.
Please excuse me.
As we are using PINGPONG_SDM845_MASK only up to and including DPU 6.x,
this is correct.
I'd then suggest rephrasing this sentence to be more explicit:
Add DPU_PINGPONG_DSC to PINGPONG_SDM845_MASK, which is used for all DPU
< 7.0 chipsets.
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists