[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c5ed90c7-7126-0757-a0e3-e3d1fcab2ecc@amd.com>
Date: Thu, 11 May 2023 10:35:37 +0100
From: Ayan Kumar Halder <ayankuma@....com>
To: robh+dt@...nel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org,
matthias.bgg@...il.com, angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com,
geert+renesas@...der.be, magnus.damm@...il.com,
konrad.dybcio@...aro.org, andersson@...nel.org,
mazziesaccount@...il.com, conor.dooley@...rochip.com, j@...nau.net,
mailingradian@...il.com, me@...ren.info, lpieralisi@...nel.org
Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org, Julien Grall <julien@....org>,
Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@...nel.org>,
Michal Orzel <michal.orzel@....com>,
Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>
Subject: Need suggestions for smp related properties in cpus.yaml to support
smpboot for cortex-r52 based platform
Hi Device Tree engineers,
Recently I have ported Xen on Cortex-R52 (AArch32-V8R processor) for our
AMD platform.
I was discussing with xen-devel community about how we can properly
support smpboot when I was suggested that this might be the correct
forum for discussion.
Please refer
https://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2023-05/msg00224.html
and the follow-ups for context.
The way smpboot works on our platform is as follows:-
1. core0 writes to register (say regA) the address of the secondary core
initialization routine.
2. core0 writes to another register (say regB) the value "0x1" to put
the secondary core in reset mode.
3. core0 writes to regB the value "0x0" to pull the secondary core out
of reset mode.
regA, regB will differ for core1, core2, core3 and so on.
Currently, I am trying to bringup core1 only.
I am thinking to use "enable-method=spin-table" in the cpu node for
core1. So that I can use "cpu-release-address" for regA.
For regB, I am thinking of introducing a new property
"amd-cpu-reset-addr" in the cpu node.
Please let me know your thoughts on this approach. I am also open to any
alternative suggestions.
Also I see that in
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.4-rc1/source/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.yaml#L87
, "arm,cortex-r52" is missing.
Can I submit a patch (a one line change) to add this ?
Kind regards,
Ayan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists