linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] PCI: xilinx-xdma: Add Xilinx XDMA Root Port driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZF6UWBd0x9LxAhoJ@bhelgaas>
Date:   Fri, 12 May 2023 14:32:40 -0500
From:   Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
To:     Thippeswamy Havalige <thippeswamy.havalige@....com>
Cc:     linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org,
        bhelgaas@...gle.com, michals@...inx.com, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        nagaradhesh.yeleswarapu@....com, bharat.kumar.gogada@....com,
        lorenzo.pieralisi@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] PCI: xilinx-xdma: Add Xilinx XDMA Root Port driver

On Fri, May 12, 2023 at 11:57:25AM +0530, Thippeswamy Havalige wrote:
> Add support for Xilinx XDMA Soft IP core as Root Port.
> ... 

> +#include <linux/of_pci.h>
> +#include <linux/irqchip/chained_irq.h>

The trend seems to be to alphabetize the system includes above.

> +#include "pcie-xilinx-common.h"
> +
> +#include "../pci.h"

Put the pcie-xilinx-common.h include here, as you did for
pcie-xilinx-cpm.c:

  #include <linux/irqchip/chained_irq.h>

  #include "../pci.h"
  #include "pcie-xilinx-common.h"

pcie-xilinx.c has a very similar list of register definitions, which
makes me wonder why it can't share pcie-xilinx-common.h as well.

Obviously it would take a bit of rework since it uses BIT(x) instead
of just "x".  But you hide the "BIT()" inside IMR(), which is arguably
slightly obscure since the #define value is not a register mask:

> +#define IMR(x) BIT(XILINX_PCIE_INTR_ ##x)

I don't really care either way, but it seems like a possibly needless
difference.

Bjorn