linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] arm64: wire up cachestat for arm64

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAKEwX=P2VW_UfdxgLfYGOq1Bho+AtHt5pci+A7r95qJSSAEFtg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 12 May 2023 14:47:50 -0700
From:   Nhat Pham <nphamcs@...il.com>
To:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        linux-api@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...a.com,
        linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, hannes@...xchg.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, arnd@...db.de, will@...nel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: wire up cachestat for arm64

On Fri, May 12, 2023 at 2:15 PM Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 12 May 2023 11:42:26 +0100 Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 02:28:43AM -0700, Nhat Pham wrote:
> > > cachestat is a new syscall that was previously wired in for most
> > > architectures:
> > >
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230503013608.2431726-1-nphamcs@gmail.com/
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20230510195806.2902878-1-nphamcs@gmail.com/
> > >
> > > However, those patches miss arm64, which has its own syscall table in arch/arm64.
> > > This patch wires cachestat in for arm64.
> >
> > You may want to clarify that this is for compat support on arm64,
> > otherwise native support uses the generic syscall numbers already.
>
> Thanks, I updated the changelog thusly.  Note that this patch is
> transitory - it will be squashed into "cachestat: wire up cachestat for
> other architectures".

It's my expectation too - it makes sense to squash it to the other patch.
Thanks, Andrew!