[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZF9igb/nvL6GRBsq@yoga>
Date: Sat, 13 May 2023 15:42:17 +0530
From: Anup Sharma <anupnewsmail@...il.com>
To: Inki Dae <inki.dae@...sung.com>,
Jagan Teki <jagan@...rulasolutions.com>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@...el.com>,
Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>,
Robert Foss <rfoss@...nel.org>,
Laurent Pinchart <Laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
Jonas Karlman <jonas@...boo.se>,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: anupnewsmail@...il.com
Subject: [PATCH] gpu: drm: bridge: No need to set device_driver owner
There is no need to exclusively set the .owner member of the struct
device_driver when defining the platform_driver struct. The Linux core
takes care of setting the .owner member as part of the call to
module_platform_driver() helper function.
Issue identified using the platform_no_drv_owner.cocci Coccinelle
semantic patch as:
drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/samsung-dsim.c:1957:6-11: No need to set .owner here.
The core will do it.
No functional changes are intended.
Signed-off-by: Anup Sharma <anupnewsmail@...il.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/samsung-dsim.c | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/samsung-dsim.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/samsung-dsim.c
index e0a402a85787..10dc3315e69e 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/samsung-dsim.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/samsung-dsim.c
@@ -1954,7 +1954,6 @@ static struct platform_driver samsung_dsim_driver = {
.remove = samsung_dsim_remove,
.driver = {
.name = "samsung-dsim",
- .owner = THIS_MODULE,
.pm = &samsung_dsim_pm_ops,
.of_match_table = samsung_dsim_of_match,
},
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists