[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAP-5=fX8N4JRseytuACXMZF7Gw8Uu15kBg7dXN2iZZg0_nG-Sg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 May 2023 10:08:52 -0700
From: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] perf annotate: Parse x86 SIB addressing properly
On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 11:27 PM Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> When the source argument of mov instruction is look like below, it didn't
> parse the whole operand and just stopped at the first comma.
>
> mov (%rbx,%rax,1),%rcx
>
> Fix it by checking the parentheses and move it to the closing one.
>
> Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Acked-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
Thanks,
Ian
> ---
> tools/perf/util/annotate.c | 13 +++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/annotate.c b/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
> index ca9f0add68f4..6053ddf9c32d 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
> @@ -550,6 +550,19 @@ static int mov__parse(struct arch *arch, struct ins_operands *ops, struct map_sy
> return -1;
>
> *s = '\0';
> +
> + /*
> + * x86 SIB addressing has something like 0x8(%rax, %rcx, 1)
> + * then it needs to have the closing parenthesis.
> + */
> + if (strchr(ops->raw, '(')) {
> + *s = ',';
> + s = strchr(ops->raw, ')');
> + if (s == NULL || s[1] != ',')
> + return -1;
> + *++s = '\0';
> + }
> +
> ops->source.raw = strdup(ops->raw);
> *s = ',';
>
> --
> 2.40.1.521.gf1e218fcd8-goog
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists