linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] scsi: core: decrease scsi_device's iorequest

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZGHypRXzI+JHVn1O@ovpn-8-26.pek2.redhat.com>
Date:   Mon, 15 May 2023 16:51:49 +0800
From:   Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>
To:     Wenchao Hao <haowenchao2@...wei.com>
Cc:     "James E . J . Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
        "Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linfeilong@...wei.com, louhongxiang@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] scsi: core: decrease scsi_device's iorequest_cnt if
 dispatch failed

On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 03:01:56PM +0800, Wenchao Hao wrote:
> If scsi_dispatch_cmd() failed, the SCSI command was not sent to the target,
> scsi_queue_rq() would return BLK_STS_RESOURCE and the related request
> would be requeued. The timeout of this request would not fire, no one would
> increase iodone_cnt.
> 
> The above flow would result the iodone_cnt smaller than iorequest_cnt.
> So decrease the iorequest_cnt if dispatch failed to workaround the issue.
> 
> Link:https://lore.kernel.org/linux-scsi/8e0f2d31-e6ff-ec4a-3974-450560ad49c5@huawei.com/T/#t
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wenchao Hao <haowenchao2@...wei.com>
> ---
>  drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
> index 03964b26f3f2..0226c9279cef 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
> @@ -1485,6 +1485,7 @@ static int scsi_dispatch_cmd(struct scsi_cmnd *cmd)
>  		 */
>  		SCSI_LOG_MLQUEUE(3, scmd_printk(KERN_INFO, cmd,
>  			"queuecommand : device blocked\n"));
> +		atomic_dec(&cmd->device->iorequest_cnt);
>  		return SCSI_MLQUEUE_DEVICE_BUSY;
>  	}
>  
> @@ -1517,6 +1518,7 @@ static int scsi_dispatch_cmd(struct scsi_cmnd *cmd)
>  	trace_scsi_dispatch_cmd_start(cmd);
>  	rtn = host->hostt->queuecommand(host, cmd);
>  	if (rtn) {
> +		atomic_dec(&cmd->device->iorequest_cnt);
>  		trace_scsi_dispatch_cmd_error(cmd, rtn);
>  		if (rtn != SCSI_MLQUEUE_DEVICE_BUSY &&
>  		    rtn != SCSI_MLQUEUE_TARGET_BUSY)

Looks fine, so the command is accounted in case that it is consumed by
scsi stack, otherwise the counter has to be undone.

Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>


Thanks,
Ming