[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <u7mmywm63bm5q4zlsbnooeplscn4rrd3qnslkfq2xnquxgnkkd@n3tsnrutmfjp>
Date: Mon, 15 May 2023 14:33:51 +0200
From: Ondřej Jirman <megi@....cz>
To: Maxime Ripard <maxime@...no.tech>
Cc: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>,
Vasily Khoruzhick <anarsoul@...il.com>,
Yangtao Li <tiny.windzz@...il.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Amit Kucheria <amitk@...nel.org>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>,
Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-sunxi@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] thermal/drivers/sun8i: Fix some error handling paths
in sun8i_ths_probe()
Hi Maxime,
On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 01:54:41PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, May 14, 2023 at 08:46:05PM +0200, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> > Should an error occur after calling sun8i_ths_resource_init() in the probe
> > function, some resources need to be released, as already done in the
> > .remove() function.
> >
> > Switch to the devm_clk_get_enabled() helper and add a new devm_action to
> > turn sun8i_ths_resource_init() into a fully managed function.
> >
> > Move the place where reset_control_deassert() is called so that the
> > recommended order of reset release/clock enable steps is kept.
> > A64 manual states that:
> >
> > 3.3.6.4. Gating and reset
> >
> > Make sure that the reset signal has been released before the release of
> > module clock gating;
> >
> > This fixes the issue and removes some LoC at the same time.
>
> It should really be three different patches:
> - One to fix the resource release, that can be backported to stable
> releases
> - One to switch to devm_clk_get_enabled
> - and one to change the order of clock enable vs reset deassertion
The order was correct before this patch. I don't think an incorrect order
should be intorduced, even if temporarily between two patches.
regards,
o.
> Maxime
Powered by blists - more mailing lists