[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ad78c18e-13dd-fca3-1aff-5b8e68a91c90@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2023 10:49:24 +0200
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
To: Ondřej Jirman <megi@....cz>,
Maxime Ripard <maxime@...no.tech>,
Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>,
Vasily Khoruzhick <anarsoul@...il.com>,
Yangtao Li <tiny.windzz@...il.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Amit Kucheria <amitk@...nel.org>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>,
Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-sunxi@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] thermal/drivers/sun8i: Fix some error handling paths
in sun8i_ths_probe()
On 15/05/2023 14:33, Ondřej Jirman wrote:
> Hi Maxime,
>
> On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 01:54:41PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Sun, May 14, 2023 at 08:46:05PM +0200, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
>>> Should an error occur after calling sun8i_ths_resource_init() in the probe
>>> function, some resources need to be released, as already done in the
>>> .remove() function.
>>>
>>> Switch to the devm_clk_get_enabled() helper and add a new devm_action to
>>> turn sun8i_ths_resource_init() into a fully managed function.
>>>
>>> Move the place where reset_control_deassert() is called so that the
>>> recommended order of reset release/clock enable steps is kept.
>>> A64 manual states that:
>>>
>>> 3.3.6.4. Gating and reset
>>>
>>> Make sure that the reset signal has been released before the release of
>>> module clock gating;
>>>
>>> This fixes the issue and removes some LoC at the same time.
>>
>> It should really be three different patches:
>> - One to fix the resource release, that can be backported to stable
>> releases
>> - One to switch to devm_clk_get_enabled
>> - and one to change the order of clock enable vs reset deassertion
>
> The order was correct before this patch. I don't think an incorrect order
> should be intorduced, even if temporarily between two patches.
Maxime ?
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists