| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <d665b1b5-cfc5-939e-7444-490e3761ab39@quicinc.com>
Date: Mon, 15 May 2023 18:45:54 +0530
From: Devi Priya <quic_devipriy@...cinc.com>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
CC: <agross@...nel.org>, <andersson@...nel.org>,
<konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>, <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
<kw@...ux.com>, <robh@...nel.org>, <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
<krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, <mturquette@...libre.com>,
<sboyd@...nel.org>, <mani@...nel.org>,
<linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>, <quic_srichara@...cinc.com>,
<quic_sjaganat@...cinc.com>, <quic_kathirav@...cinc.com>,
<quic_arajkuma@...cinc.com>, <quic_anusha@...cinc.com>,
<quic_ipkumar@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 4/6] arm64: dts: qcom: ipq9574: Add PCIe PHYs and
controller nodes
On 5/15/2023 3:21 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Mon, 15 May 2023 at 12:36, Devi Priya <quic_devipriy@...cinc.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 5/8/2023 5:10 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>>> On 08/05/2023 13:53, Devi Priya wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 4/22/2023 5:49 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, 21 Apr 2023 at 15:50, Devi Priya <quic_devipriy@...cinc.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Add PCIe0, PCIe1, PCIe2, PCIe3 (and corresponding PHY) devices
>>>>>> found on IPQ9574 platform. The PCIe0 & PCIe1 are 1-lane Gen3
>>>>>> host whereas PCIe2 & PCIe3 are 2-lane Gen3 host.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Co-developed-by: Anusha Rao <quic_anusha@...cinc.com>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Anusha Rao <quic_anusha@...cinc.com>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Devi Priya <quic_devipriy@...cinc.com>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> Changes in V3:
>>>>>> - Fixed up the PCI I/O port ranges
>>>>>>
>>>>>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574.dtsi | 375
>>>>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>>>>> 1 file changed, 370 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574.dtsi
>>>>>> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574.dtsi
>>>>>> index e757b57957cf..953a839a1141 100644
>>>>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574.dtsi
>>>>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574.dtsi
>>>>>> @@ -6,8 +6,8 @@
>>>>>> * Copyright (c) 2023, Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. All rights
>>>>>> reserved.
>>>>>> */
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -#include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h>
>>>>>> #include <dt-bindings/clock/qcom,ipq9574-gcc.h>
>>>>>> +#include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h>
>>>>>> #include <dt-bindings/reset/qcom,ipq9574-gcc.h>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> / {
>>>>>> @@ -116,6 +116,58 @@
>>>>>> #size-cells = <1>;
>>>>>> ranges = <0 0 0 0xffffffff>;
>>>>>>
>>>>>> + pcie0_phy: phy@...00 {
>>>>>> + compatible =
>>>>>> "qcom,ipq9574-qmp-gen3x1-pcie-phy";
>>>>>> + reg = <0x00084000 0x1000>;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + clocks = <&gcc GCC_PCIE0_AUX_CLK>,
>>>>>> + <&gcc GCC_PCIE0_AHB_CLK>,
>>>>>> + <&gcc GCC_ANOC_PCIE0_1LANE_M_CLK>,
>>>>>> + <&gcc GCC_SNOC_PCIE0_1LANE_S_CLK>,
>>>>>> + <&gcc GCC_PCIE0_PIPE_CLK>;
>>>>>> + clock-names = "aux", "cfg_ahb", "anoc_lane",
>>>>>> "snoc_lane", "pipe";
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + assigned-clocks = <&gcc GCC_PCIE0_AUX_CLK>;
>>>>>> + assigned-clock-rates = <20000000>;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + resets = <&gcc GCC_PCIE0_PHY_BCR>,
>>>>>> + <&gcc GCC_PCIE0PHY_PHY_BCR>;
>>>>>> + reset-names = "phy", "common";
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + #clock-cells = <0>;
>>>>>> + clock-output-names = "gcc_pcie0_pipe_clk_src";
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + #phy-cells = <0>;
>>>>>> + status = "disabled";
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + };
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + pcie2_phy: phy@...00 {
>>>>>> + compatible =
>>>>>> "qcom,ipq9574-qmp-gen3x2-pcie-phy";
>>>>>> + reg = <0x0008c000 0x2000>;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + clocks = <&gcc GCC_PCIE2_AUX_CLK>,
>>>>>> + <&gcc GCC_PCIE2_AHB_CLK>,
>>>>>> + <&gcc GCC_ANOC_PCIE2_2LANE_M_CLK>,
>>>>>> + <&gcc GCC_SNOC_PCIE2_2LANE_S_CLK>,
>>>>>> + <&gcc GCC_PCIE2_PIPE_CLK>;
>>>>>> + clock-names = "aux", "cfg_ahb", "anoc_lane",
>>>>>> "snoc_lane", "pipe";
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + assigned-clocks = <&gcc GCC_PCIE2_AUX_CLK>;
>>>>>> + assigned-clock-rates = <20000000>;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + resets = <&gcc GCC_PCIE2_PHY_BCR>,
>>>>>> + <&gcc GCC_PCIE2PHY_PHY_BCR>;
>>>>>> + reset-names = "phy", "common";
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + #clock-cells = <0>;
>>>>>> + clock-output-names = "gcc_pcie2_pipe_clk_src";
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + #phy-cells = <0>;
>>>>>> + status = "disabled";
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + };
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> rng: rng@...00 {
>>>>>> compatible = "qcom,prng-ee";
>>>>>> reg = <0x000e3000 0x1000>;
>>>>>> @@ -123,6 +175,58 @@
>>>>>> clock-names = "core";
>>>>>> };
>>>>>>
>>>>>> + pcie3_phy: phy@...00 {
>>>>>> + compatible =
>>>>>> "qcom,ipq9574-qmp-gen3x2-pcie-phy";
>>>>>> + reg = <0x000f4000 0x2000>;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + clocks = <&gcc GCC_PCIE3_AUX_CLK>,
>>>>>> + <&gcc GCC_PCIE3_AHB_CLK>,
>>>>>> + <&gcc GCC_ANOC_PCIE3_2LANE_M_CLK>,
>>>>>> + <&gcc GCC_SNOC_PCIE3_2LANE_S_CLK>,
>>>>>> + <&gcc GCC_PCIE3_PIPE_CLK>;
>>>>>> + clock-names = "aux", "cfg_ahb", "anoc_lane",
>>>>>> "snoc_lane", "pipe";
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + assigned-clocks = <&gcc GCC_PCIE3_AUX_CLK>;
>>>>>> + assigned-clock-rates = <20000000>;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + resets = <&gcc GCC_PCIE3_PHY_BCR>,
>>>>>> + <&gcc GCC_PCIE3PHY_PHY_BCR>;
>>>>>> + reset-names = "phy", "common";
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + #clock-cells = <0>;
>>>>>> + clock-output-names = "gcc_pcie3_pipe_clk_src";
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + #phy-cells = <0>;
>>>>>> + status = "disabled";
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + };
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + pcie1_phy: phy@...00 {
>>>>>> + compatible =
>>>>>> "qcom,ipq9574-qmp-gen3x1-pcie-phy";
>>>>>> + reg = <0x000fc000 0x1000>;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + clocks = <&gcc GCC_PCIE1_AUX_CLK>,
>>>>>> + <&gcc GCC_PCIE1_AHB_CLK>,
>>>>>> + <&gcc GCC_ANOC_PCIE1_1LANE_M_CLK>,
>>>>>> + <&gcc GCC_SNOC_PCIE1_1LANE_S_CLK>,
>>>>>> + <&gcc GCC_PCIE1_PIPE_CLK>;
>>>>>> + clock-names = "aux", "cfg_ahb", "anoc_lane",
>>>>>> "snoc_lane", "pipe";
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + assigned-clocks = <&gcc GCC_PCIE1_AUX_CLK>;
>>>>>> + assigned-clock-rates = <20000000>;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + resets = <&gcc GCC_PCIE1_PHY_BCR>,
>>>>>> + <&gcc GCC_PCIE1PHY_PHY_BCR>;
>>>>>> + reset-names = "phy", "common";
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + #clock-cells = <0>;
>>>>>> + clock-output-names = "gcc_pcie1_pipe_clk_src";
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + #phy-cells = <0>;
>>>>>> + status = "disabled";
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + };
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> tlmm: pinctrl@...0000 {
>>>>>> compatible = "qcom,ipq9574-tlmm";
>>>>>> reg = <0x01000000 0x300000>;
>>>>>> @@ -146,10 +250,10 @@
>>>>>> reg = <0x01800000 0x80000>;
>>>>>> clocks = <&xo_board_clk>,
>>>>>> <&sleep_clk>,
>>>>>> - <0>,
>>>>>> - <0>,
>>>>>> - <0>,
>>>>>> - <0>,
>>>>>> + <&pcie0_phy>,
>>>>>> + <&pcie1_phy>,
>>>>>> + <&pcie2_phy>,
>>>>>> + <&pcie3_phy>,
>>>>>> <0>;
>>>>>> #clock-cells = <1>;
>>>>>> #reset-cells = <1>;
>>>>>> @@ -478,6 +582,267 @@
>>>>>> status = "disabled";
>>>>>> };
>>>>>> };
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + pcie1: pci@...00000 {
>>>>>> + compatible = "qcom,pcie-ipq9574";
>>>>>> + reg = <0x10000000 0xf1d>,
>>>>>> + <0x10000F20 0xa8>,
>>>>>> + <0x10001000 0x1000>,
>>>>>> + <0x000F8000 0x4000>,
>>>>>> + <0x10100000 0x1000>;
>>>>>> + reg-names = "dbi", "elbi", "atu", "parf",
>>>>>> "config";
>>>>>> + device_type = "pci";
>>>>>> + linux,pci-domain = <2>;
>>>>>> + bus-range = <0x00 0xff>;
>>>>>> + num-lanes = <1>;
>>>>>> + #address-cells = <3>;
>>>>>> + #size-cells = <2>;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + ranges = <0x01000000 0x0 0x00000000
>>>>>> 0x10200000 0x0 0x100000>, /* I/O */
>>>>>> + <0x02000000 0x0 0x10300000
>>>>>> 0x10300000 0x0 0x7d00000>; /* MEM */
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + #interrupt-cells = <1>;
>>>>>> + interrupt-map-mask = <0 0 0 0x7>;
>>>>>> + interrupt-map = <0 0 0 1 &intc 0 35
>>>>>> IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>, /* int_a */
>>>>>> + <0 0 0 2 &intc 0 49
>>>>>> IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>, /* int_b */
>>>>>> + <0 0 0 3 &intc 0 84
>>>>>> IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>, /* int_c */
>>>>>> + <0 0 0 4 &intc 0 85
>>>>>> IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; /* int_d */
>>>>>> +
>>>>>
>>>>> No iommu-map?
>>>> We do not enable the IOMMU stage1 translation for PCIe and the registers
>>>> have secure access only from TrustZone (It enables only stage2 for
>>>> Access control)
>>>
>>> So, no SMMU protection for PCIe transactions? This sounds like a step
>>> backwards.
>> Yes, we are not using stage1 translations.
>
> We = software or we = hardware? If there is a hardware interface to
> SMMU, please describe it here.
>
Trustzone software protects all non-secure access to any SMMU register.
Hence it is not possible to enable stage 1 translation from HLOS.
HLOS touching any SMMU register would result in a 'secure access violation'
Thanks,
Devi Priya
Powered by blists - more mailing lists