[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZGOfzspBW4/inoXe@finisterre.sirena.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 17 May 2023 00:22:54 +0900
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Rasmus Villemoes <rasmus.villemoes@...vas.dk>
Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>,
Kevin Groeneveld <kgroeneveld@...brook.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] spi: spi-imx: fix use of more than four chip selects
On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 01:43:23PM +0200, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> So, what's the conclusion here? Will these three patches be applied, or
> will we just live with the status as of next-20230516, namely that
As pointed out by Amit this will need a resend against current code.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists