linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] clk: qcom: mmcc-msm8974: Add OXILICX

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <275c997a-a09d-113f-631d-bb677a05ac5f@linaro.org>
Date:   Tue, 16 May 2023 02:15:06 +0200
From:   Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
To:     Luca Weiss <luca@...tu.xyz>,
        Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
        ~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht, phone-devel@...r.kernel.org,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        Bartosz Dudziak <bartosz.dudziak@...jp.pl>
Cc:     linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: qcom: mmcc-msm8974: Add OXILICX_GDSC for msm8226



On 9.05.2023 18:57, Luca Weiss wrote:
> On Montag, 8. Mai 2023 13:35:07 CEST Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>> On 8.05.2023 13:32, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>>> On 08/05/2023 10:23, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>>>> On 6.05.2023 23:20, Luca Weiss wrote:
>>>>> On msm8226 we also have OXILICX_GDSC but we need a slighly different
>>>>> config, with a .cxcs defined for clock but with no parent.
>>>>
>>>> Hm, on newer (a5xx+) GPUs, CX needs to be turned on first and
>>>> to achieve that, we sometimes define it to be the GX's (also
>>>> implicitly known as "oxili-non-CX" in before-a6xx-times) parent..
>>>>
>>>> Roughly speaking CX powers the "GPU hardware owned by the broader
>>>> SoC that may not need the GPU core clock to be up" and GX powers
>>>> the "GPU hardware owned strictly by the GPU that needs at least some
>>>> GPU clocks to be enabled"
>>>>
>>>> Maybe 8974 simply has a bug in the driver that would do the reverse?
>>>> Could you (and perhaps Dmitry on his shiny new 13yo board) test that
>>>> theory, preferably on both SoCs?
>>>>
>>>> --- a/drivers/clk/qcom/mmcc-msm8974.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/mmcc-msm8974.c
>>>> @@ -2431,6 +2431,7 @@ static struct gdsc oxili_gdsc = {
>>>>          .pd = {
>>>>                  .name = "oxili",
>>>>          },
>>>> +       .parent = &oxili_gdsc.pd,
>>>>          .pwrsts = PWRSTS_OFF_ON,
>>>>   };
>>>
>>> Are you declaring oxili_gdsc to be a parent of itself?
>>
>> lol.. nice catch of course this line should have been
>>
>> +       .parent = &oxilicx_gdsc.pd,
>>
>> and the definitions would need to be swapped
> 
> The 0x4024 oxili_gdsc (downstream name gdsc_oxili_gx) is disabled in 8226 dts.
> 
> Only in downstream msm8974.dtsi this gdsc gets "parent-supply = 
> <&pm8841_s4_corner>;", on 8226 there's no parent-supply. And the gdsc parent 
> doesn't even seem to be described there.
> 
> Should I still try?
No, nevermind, this SoC is cut down more than I had initially thought.

Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>

with a minor nit: oxilicx -> oxili_cx

Konrad
> 
>>
>> Konrad
>>
>>>>   @@ -2439,7 +2440,6 @@ static struct gdsc oxilicx_gdsc = {
>>>>          .pd = {
>>>>                  .name = "oxilicx",
>>>>          },
>>>> -       .parent = &oxili_gdsc.pd,
>>>>          .pwrsts = PWRSTS_OFF_ON,
>>>>   };
>>>>
>>>> Konrad
>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <luca@...tu.xyz>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>   drivers/clk/qcom/mmcc-msm8974.c | 11 +++++++++++
>>>>>   1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/mmcc-msm8974.c
>>>>> b/drivers/clk/qcom/mmcc-msm8974.c index 4273fce9a4a4..39ee3953567c
>>>>> 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/clk/qcom/mmcc-msm8974.c
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/mmcc-msm8974.c
>>>>> @@ -2443,6 +2443,16 @@ static struct gdsc oxilicx_gdsc = {
>>>>>       .pwrsts = PWRSTS_OFF_ON,
>>>>>   };
>>>>>   +static struct gdsc oxilicx_gdsc_msm8226 = {
>>>>> +    .gdscr = 0x4034,
>>>>> +    .cxcs = (unsigned int []){ 0x4028 },
>>>>> +    .cxc_count = 1,
>>>>> +    .pd = {
>>>>> +        .name = "oxilicx",
>>>>> +    },
>>>>> +    .pwrsts = PWRSTS_OFF_ON,
>>>>> +};
>>>>> +
>>>>>   static struct clk_regmap *mmcc_msm8226_clocks[] = {
>>>>>       [MMSS_AHB_CLK_SRC] = &mmss_ahb_clk_src.clkr,
>>>>>       [MMSS_AXI_CLK_SRC] = &mmss_axi_clk_src.clkr,
>>>>> @@ -2533,6 +2543,7 @@ static struct gdsc *mmcc_msm8226_gdscs[] = {
>>>>>       [MDSS_GDSC] = &mdss_gdsc,
>>>>>       [CAMSS_JPEG_GDSC] = &camss_jpeg_gdsc,
>>>>>       [CAMSS_VFE_GDSC] = &camss_vfe_gdsc,
>>>>> +    [OXILICX_GDSC] = &oxilicx_gdsc_msm8226,
>>>>>   };
>>>>>     static const struct regmap_config mmcc_msm8226_regmap_config = {
>>>>>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> base-commit: dd9e11d6477a52ede9ebe575c83285e79e823889
>>>>> change-id: 20230506-msm8226-oxilicx-7f3f0f8e491d
>>>>>
>>>>> Best regards,
> 
> 
> 
>