lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 23 May 2023 22:44:36 +0200
From:   Luca Weiss <luca@...tu.xyz>
To:     Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
        ~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht, phone-devel@...r.kernel.org,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        Bartosz Dudziak <bartosz.dudziak@...jp.pl>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
Cc:     linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: qcom: mmcc-msm8974: Add OXILICX_GDSC for msm8226

On Dienstag, 16. Mai 2023 02:15:06 CEST Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On 9.05.2023 18:57, Luca Weiss wrote:
> > On Montag, 8. Mai 2023 13:35:07 CEST Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> >> On 8.05.2023 13:32, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> >>> On 08/05/2023 10:23, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> >>>> On 6.05.2023 23:20, Luca Weiss wrote:
> >>>>> On msm8226 we also have OXILICX_GDSC but we need a slighly different
> >>>>> config, with a .cxcs defined for clock but with no parent.
> >>>> 
> >>>> Hm, on newer (a5xx+) GPUs, CX needs to be turned on first and
> >>>> to achieve that, we sometimes define it to be the GX's (also
> >>>> implicitly known as "oxili-non-CX" in before-a6xx-times) parent..
> >>>> 
> >>>> Roughly speaking CX powers the "GPU hardware owned by the broader
> >>>> SoC that may not need the GPU core clock to be up" and GX powers
> >>>> the "GPU hardware owned strictly by the GPU that needs at least some
> >>>> GPU clocks to be enabled"
> >>>> 
> >>>> Maybe 8974 simply has a bug in the driver that would do the reverse?
> >>>> Could you (and perhaps Dmitry on his shiny new 13yo board) test that
> >>>> theory, preferably on both SoCs?
> >>>> 
> >>>> --- a/drivers/clk/qcom/mmcc-msm8974.c
> >>>> +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/mmcc-msm8974.c
> >>>> @@ -2431,6 +2431,7 @@ static struct gdsc oxili_gdsc = {
> >>>> 
> >>>>          .pd = {
> >>>>          
> >>>>                  .name = "oxili",
> >>>>          
> >>>>          },
> >>>> 
> >>>> +       .parent = &oxili_gdsc.pd,
> >>>> 
> >>>>          .pwrsts = PWRSTS_OFF_ON,
> >>>>   
> >>>>   };
> >>> 
> >>> Are you declaring oxili_gdsc to be a parent of itself?
> >> 
> >> lol.. nice catch of course this line should have been
> >> 
> >> +       .parent = &oxilicx_gdsc.pd,
> >> 
> >> and the definitions would need to be swapped
> > 
> > The 0x4024 oxili_gdsc (downstream name gdsc_oxili_gx) is disabled in 8226
> > dts.
> > 
> > Only in downstream msm8974.dtsi this gdsc gets "parent-supply =
> > <&pm8841_s4_corner>;", on 8226 there's no parent-supply. And the gdsc
> > parent doesn't even seem to be described there.
> > 
> > Should I still try?
> 
> No, nevermind, this SoC is cut down more than I had initially thought.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
> 
> with a minor nit: oxilicx -> oxili_cx

Hi Konrad,

where do you want this changed? Just the .name field? But even that one is now 
matching the other oxilicx variant. And there's also gdscs like 
oxilicx_ahb_clk.

Let me know.

Regards
Luca

> 
> Konrad
> 
> >> Konrad
> >> 
> >>>>   @@ -2439,7 +2440,6 @@ static struct gdsc oxilicx_gdsc = {
> >>>>   
> >>>>          .pd = {
> >>>>          
> >>>>                  .name = "oxilicx",
> >>>>          
> >>>>          },
> >>>> 
> >>>> -       .parent = &oxili_gdsc.pd,
> >>>> 
> >>>>          .pwrsts = PWRSTS_OFF_ON,
> >>>>   
> >>>>   };
> >>>> 
> >>>> Konrad
> >>>> 
> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <luca@...tu.xyz>
> >>>>> ---
> >>>>> 
> >>>>>   drivers/clk/qcom/mmcc-msm8974.c | 11 +++++++++++
> >>>>>   1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/mmcc-msm8974.c
> >>>>> b/drivers/clk/qcom/mmcc-msm8974.c index 4273fce9a4a4..39ee3953567c
> >>>>> 100644
> >>>>> --- a/drivers/clk/qcom/mmcc-msm8974.c
> >>>>> +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/mmcc-msm8974.c
> >>>>> @@ -2443,6 +2443,16 @@ static struct gdsc oxilicx_gdsc = {
> >>>>> 
> >>>>>       .pwrsts = PWRSTS_OFF_ON,
> >>>>>   
> >>>>>   };
> >>>>>   +static struct gdsc oxilicx_gdsc_msm8226 = {
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> +    .gdscr = 0x4034,
> >>>>> +    .cxcs = (unsigned int []){ 0x4028 },
> >>>>> +    .cxc_count = 1,
> >>>>> +    .pd = {
> >>>>> +        .name = "oxilicx",
> >>>>> +    },
> >>>>> +    .pwrsts = PWRSTS_OFF_ON,
> >>>>> +};
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> 
> >>>>>   static struct clk_regmap *mmcc_msm8226_clocks[] = {
> >>>>>   
> >>>>>       [MMSS_AHB_CLK_SRC] = &mmss_ahb_clk_src.clkr,
> >>>>>       [MMSS_AXI_CLK_SRC] = &mmss_axi_clk_src.clkr,
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> @@ -2533,6 +2543,7 @@ static struct gdsc *mmcc_msm8226_gdscs[] = {
> >>>>> 
> >>>>>       [MDSS_GDSC] = &mdss_gdsc,
> >>>>>       [CAMSS_JPEG_GDSC] = &camss_jpeg_gdsc,
> >>>>>       [CAMSS_VFE_GDSC] = &camss_vfe_gdsc,
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> +    [OXILICX_GDSC] = &oxilicx_gdsc_msm8226,
> >>>>> 
> >>>>>   };
> >>>>>   
> >>>>>     static const struct regmap_config mmcc_msm8226_regmap_config = {
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> ---
> >>>>> base-commit: dd9e11d6477a52ede9ebe575c83285e79e823889
> >>>>> change-id: 20230506-msm8226-oxilicx-7f3f0f8e491d
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> Best regards,




Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ