[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <94958409-f726-9da6-3b9f-76efa022ee9d@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 17 May 2023 16:36:57 +0800
From: Chao Yu <chao@...nel.org>
To: Wu Bo <bo.wu@...o.com>
Cc: jaegeuk@...nel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, wubo.oduw@...il.com
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 1/1] f2fs: pass I_NEW flag to trace event
On 2023/5/17 11:59, Wu Bo wrote:
> On 2023/5/17 10:44, Chao Yu wrote:
>> On 2023/5/16 20:07, Wu Bo wrote:
>>> Modify the order between 'trace_f2fs_iget' & 'unlock_new_inode', so the
>>> I_NEW can pass to the trace event when the inode initialised.
>>
>> Why is it needed? And trace_f2fs_iget() won't print inode->i_state?
>
> When connect a trace_probe to f2fs_iget, it will be able to determine whether
> the inode is new initialised in order to do different process.
I didn't get it, you want to hook __tracepoint_f2fs_iget() w/ your own callback?
Thanks,
>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Wu Bo <bo.wu@...o.com>
>>> ---
>>> fs/f2fs/inode.c | 2 +-
>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/inode.c b/fs/f2fs/inode.c
>>> index cf4327ad106c..caf959289fe7 100644
>>> --- a/fs/f2fs/inode.c
>>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/inode.c
>>> @@ -577,8 +577,8 @@ struct inode *f2fs_iget(struct super_block *sb,
>>> unsigned long ino)
>>> file_dont_truncate(inode);
>>> }
>>> - unlock_new_inode(inode);
>>> trace_f2fs_iget(inode);
>>> + unlock_new_inode(inode);
>>> return inode;
>>> bad_inode:
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
>> Linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists