[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230517092100.wgnfuzdhgotlvv22@CAB-WSD-L081021>
Date: Wed, 17 May 2023 12:21:00 +0300
From: Dmitry Rokosov <ddrokosov@...rdevices.ru>
To: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>
CC: George Stark <gnstark@...rdevices.ru>, <jic23@...nel.org>,
<lars@...afoo.de>, <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>,
<khilman@...libre.com>, <jbrunet@...libre.com>,
<andy.shevchenko@...il.com>, <nuno.sa@...log.com>,
<linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <kernel@...rdevices.ru>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] meson saradc: fix clock divider mask length
Hello Martin,
On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 09:08:26PM +0200, Martin Blumenstingl wrote:
> Hi George,
>
> thank you for this patch!
>
> On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 11:06 PM George Stark <gnstark@...rdevices.ru> wrote:
> >
> > From: George Stark <GNStark@...rdevices.ru>
> >
> > According to datasheets of supported meson SOCs
> > length of ADC_CLK_DIV field is 6 bits long
> I have a question about this sentence which doesn't affect this patch
> - it's only about managing expectations:
> Which SoC are you referring to?
> This divider is only relevant on older SoCs that predate GXBB (S905).
> To my knowledge all SoCs from GXBB onwards place the divider in the
> main or AO clock controller, so this bitmask is irrelevant there.
>
We are currently working with the A1 SoC family, specifically the A113L
variant. According to the datasheet for the A113L, the ADC_CLK_DIV can
be found in the SAR_ADC_REG3 register as a 6-bit value located within
bits 15 through 10.
> > Fixes: 3adbf3427330 ("iio: adc: add a driver for the SAR ADC found in Amlogic Meson SoCs")
> > Signed-off-by: George Stark <GNStark@...rdevices.ru>
> Since my question above doesn't affect this patch:
> Reviewed-by: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>
--
Thank you,
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists