linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] drm/msm/dpu: drop DSPP_MSM8998

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 18 May 2023 21:41:45 +0200
From:   Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>
To:     Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com>
Cc:     freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org, Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>,
        Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
        Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>, David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, quic_jesszhan@...cinc.com,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] drm/msm/dpu: drop DSPP_MSM8998_MASK from hw
 catalog

On 2023-04-28 15:36:46, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
> Since GC and IGC masks have now been dropped DSPP_MSM8998_MASK
> is same as DSPP_SC7180_MASK. Since DSPP_SC7180_MASK is used more

is *the* same

> than DSPP_MSM8998_MASK, lets drop the latter.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com>
> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
> Reviewed-by: Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_3_0_msm8998.h | 4 ++--
>  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.c          | 2 --
>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_3_0_msm8998.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_3_0_msm8998.h
> index bdcd554fc8a8..a4679f72a262 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_3_0_msm8998.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_3_0_msm8998.h
> @@ -127,9 +127,9 @@ static const struct dpu_pingpong_cfg msm8998_pp[] = {
>  };
>  
>  static const struct dpu_dspp_cfg msm8998_dspp[] = {
> -	DSPP_BLK("dspp_0", DSPP_0, 0x54000, DSPP_MSM8998_MASK,
> +	DSPP_BLK("dspp_0", DSPP_0, 0x54000, DSPP_SC7180_MASK,
>  		 &msm8998_dspp_sblk),
> -	DSPP_BLK("dspp_1", DSPP_1, 0x56000, DSPP_MSM8998_MASK,
> +	DSPP_BLK("dspp_1", DSPP_1, 0x56000, DSPP_SC7180_MASK,
>  		 &msm8998_dspp_sblk),
>  };
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.c
> index 791a6fc8bdbf..efd466f6122b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.c
> @@ -91,8 +91,6 @@
>  
>  #define MERGE_3D_SM8150_MASK (0)
>  
> -#define DSPP_MSM8998_MASK BIT(DPU_DSPP_PCC)
> -
>  #define DSPP_SC7180_MASK BIT(DPU_DSPP_PCC)

Should we add preliminary parenthesis around this?

- Marijn

>  
>  #define INTF_SDM845_MASK (0)
> -- 
> 2.40.1
>