linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] drm/msm/dpu: drop DSPP_MSM8998

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2c688487-a5b1-155c-f73a-69358d03e478@linaro.org>
Date:   Fri, 19 May 2023 00:26:33 +0300
From:   Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
To:     Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>,
        Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com>
Cc:     freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org, Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>,
        Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>, David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, quic_jesszhan@...cinc.com,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] drm/msm/dpu: drop DSPP_MSM8998_MASK from hw
 catalog

On 18/05/2023 22:41, Marijn Suijten wrote:
> On 2023-04-28 15:36:46, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
>> Since GC and IGC masks have now been dropped DSPP_MSM8998_MASK
>> is same as DSPP_SC7180_MASK. Since DSPP_SC7180_MASK is used more
> 
> is *the* same

And, I think, a comma is missing before DSPP_MSM8998_MASK.

Note: since the English language is not native for most of the 
developers, I usually don't nitpick on these issues provided we can 
understand the message without too much trouble (and the mistake doesn't 
stand out aloud, begging for it to be fixed).

I will fix missing articles when applying, if I don't forget.

> 
>> than DSPP_MSM8998_MASK, lets drop the latter.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
>> Reviewed-by: Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>
>> ---
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_3_0_msm8998.h | 4 ++--
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.c          | 2 --
>>   2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_3_0_msm8998.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_3_0_msm8998.h
>> index bdcd554fc8a8..a4679f72a262 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_3_0_msm8998.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_3_0_msm8998.h
>> @@ -127,9 +127,9 @@ static const struct dpu_pingpong_cfg msm8998_pp[] = {
>>   };
>>   
>>   static const struct dpu_dspp_cfg msm8998_dspp[] = {
>> -	DSPP_BLK("dspp_0", DSPP_0, 0x54000, DSPP_MSM8998_MASK,
>> +	DSPP_BLK("dspp_0", DSPP_0, 0x54000, DSPP_SC7180_MASK,
>>   		 &msm8998_dspp_sblk),
>> -	DSPP_BLK("dspp_1", DSPP_1, 0x56000, DSPP_MSM8998_MASK,
>> +	DSPP_BLK("dspp_1", DSPP_1, 0x56000, DSPP_SC7180_MASK,
>>   		 &msm8998_dspp_sblk),
>>   };
>>   
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.c
>> index 791a6fc8bdbf..efd466f6122b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.c
>> @@ -91,8 +91,6 @@
>>   
>>   #define MERGE_3D_SM8150_MASK (0)
>>   
>> -#define DSPP_MSM8998_MASK BIT(DPU_DSPP_PCC)
>> -
>>   #define DSPP_SC7180_MASK BIT(DPU_DSPP_PCC)
> 
> Should we add preliminary parenthesis around this?
> 
> - Marijn
> 
>>   
>>   #define INTF_SDM845_MASK (0)
>> -- 
>> 2.40.1
>>

-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry