[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230518-60da3b82641bdaccec589b8b@orel>
Date: Thu, 18 May 2023 09:32:55 +0200
From: Andrew Jones <ajones@...tanamicro.com>
To: Haibo Xu <xiaobo55x@...il.com>
Cc: Haibo Xu <haibo1.xu@...el.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>,
Atish Patra <atishp@...shpatra.org>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kvm-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] KVM: selftests: Add riscv get-reg-list test
On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 12:17:18PM +0800, Haibo Xu wrote:
...
> > The idea of these *to_str functions is to dump output that can be
> > copy+pasted into a reg array (hence the trailing commas in print_reg
> > lines). So we can't just print random lines here or return '##UNKOWN##',
> > as that won't compile. Instead, the default should return
> >
> > str_with_index("KVM_REG_RISCV_CONFIG_REG(##)", reg_off)
> >
>
> Thanks for sharing the detailed idea, will fix it in next version!
I guess we could also return a string like,
"KVM_REG_RISCV_CONFIG_REG(##) /* UNKNOWN */"
as that would still compile and also convey the message that this
register doesn't have a name because the test doesn't know it yet.
...
> > We should share all the code above, except print_reg(), with aarch64.
> > I'll send a patch series that splits the arch-neutral code out of
> > the aarch64 test that you can base this test on.
> >
>
> Good idea! I will rebase the patch based on your work.
>
Ok, I've pushed patches to [1]. This series introduces two things to KVM
selftests. Primarily it splits the aarch64/get-reg-list test into a
cross-arch get-reg-list test and an $ARCH_DIR/get-reg-list.o object file,
which the cross-arch test depends on. To do that, it also introduces the
concept of a "split test", a test that has a cross-arch part which depends
on an arch-specific part. Using a split test is cleaner than the
#ifdeffery we usually do for cross-arch tests.
I've added kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev, Marc, Oliver, and Sean to the CC of
this message. You'll want to add them when you post v2 as well.
[1] https://github.com/jones-drew/linux/commits/arm64/kself/get-reg-list
Thanks,
drew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists