linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 2/3] usb: phy: Add driver for the Realtek SoC USB 2.0/3.0 PHY

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZGe0f4OfaXzweSp3@matsya>
Date:   Fri, 19 May 2023 23:10:15 +0530
From:   Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:     Stanley Chang <stanley_chang@...ltek.com>,
        Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
        Ray Chi <raychi@...gle.com>,
        Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>,
        Eugeniu Rosca <erosca@...adit-jv.com>,
        Michael Grzeschik <m.grzeschik@...gutronix.de>,
        Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>,
        Flavio Suligoi <f.suligoi@...m.it>,
        Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...ux.intel.com>,
        Bhuvanesh Surachari <Bhuvanesh_Surachari@...tor.com>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        "linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/3] usb: phy: Add driver for the Realtek SoC USB
 2.0/3.0 PHY

On 19-05-23, 13:01, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Fri, May 19, 2023, at 12:58, Stanley Chang[昌育德] wrote:
> >> 
> >> I'm pretty sure that drivers/usb/phy/ is deprecated now...
> >> 
> >> New drivers should be written for the generic PHY subsystem in
> >> drivers/phy/.
> 
> Indeed, I missed that in my review.
> 
> > Thanks for your reminder.
> > Will drivers/usb/phy be removed?
> > Is it not allowed to add new drivers?
> >
> > In our application, driver/phy is not suitable.
> > We need to notify the phy driver when the USB hub port status changes.
> > However, generic PHY drivers are designed for various device's PHY.
> > And it seems inappropriate to add this function. So we choose to use 
> > driver/usb/phy. 
> 
> If you run into something that works in the old usbphy layer
> but can't be done in drivers/phy, I think the better solution
> would be to change the drivers/phy/ code to add this.

The is correct, phy interfaces can be improved upon and have been added
upon as and when we have users.

FWIW there are already usb phy drivers in Generic phy susbystem, so you
need to really justify why you need a new interface?

-- 
~Vinod