lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230519185703.GA3288616@google.com>
Date:   Fri, 19 May 2023 18:57:03 +0000
From:   Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>
To:     范俊杰 <junjie2020@...as.ac.cn>
Cc:     martin.petersen@...cle.com, jejb@...ux.ibm.com,
        linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: memory leak in do_epoll_create

On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 04:30:26PM +0800, 范俊杰 wrote:
> Hi Kernel maintainers,
> 
> Our tool found a new bug memory leak in do_epoll_create in Kernel commit
> v5.14.
> 

v5.14 is almost 2 years old.  Why are you testing such an old kernel version?
This bug could have already been fixed almost 2 years ago.

Also, if you think this is a bug in eventpoll, this report should be sent to
linux-fsdevel, as per './scripts/get_maintainer.pl fs/eventpoll.c'.  It's
unclear why you are sending this report to linux-scsi.

> The report is as below and this bug don't have a repro C program until
> now. Please inform me if you confirm this is a reproducible bug.

I think you answered your own question.  It doesn't have a reproducer;
therefore, it's not reproducible.

- Eric

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ