[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZGfGs85B4hPBBxXc@Asurada-Nvidia>
Date: Fri, 19 May 2023 11:57:55 -0700
From: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@...dia.com>
To: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@...el.com>
CC: "Liu, Yi L" <yi.l.liu@...el.com>,
"joro@...tes.org" <joro@...tes.org>,
"alex.williamson@...hat.com" <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
"jgg@...dia.com" <jgg@...dia.com>,
"robin.murphy@....com" <robin.murphy@....com>,
"baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com" <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>,
"cohuck@...hat.com" <cohuck@...hat.com>,
"eric.auger@...hat.com" <eric.auger@...hat.com>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"mjrosato@...ux.ibm.com" <mjrosato@...ux.ibm.com>,
"chao.p.peng@...ux.intel.com" <chao.p.peng@...ux.intel.com>,
"yi.y.sun@...ux.intel.com" <yi.y.sun@...ux.intel.com>,
"peterx@...hat.com" <peterx@...hat.com>,
"jasowang@...hat.com" <jasowang@...hat.com>,
"shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com"
<shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com>,
"lulu@...hat.com" <lulu@...hat.com>,
"suravee.suthikulpanit@....com" <suravee.suthikulpanit@....com>,
"iommu@...ts.linux.dev" <iommu@...ts.linux.dev>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
"Duan, Zhenzhong" <zhenzhong.duan@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/11] iommufd/hw_pagetable: Use domain_alloc_user op
for domain allocation
On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 08:56:25AM +0000, Tian, Kevin wrote:
> > From: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@...el.com>
> > Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2023 10:39 PM
> >
> >
> > @@ -88,7 +90,10 @@ iommufd_hw_pagetable_alloc(struct iommufd_ctx
> > *ictx, struct iommufd_ioas *ioas,
> > refcount_inc(&ioas->obj.users);
> > hwpt->ioas = ioas;
> >
> > - hwpt->domain = iommu_domain_alloc(idev->dev->bus);
> > + if (ops->domain_alloc_user)
> > + hwpt->domain = ops->domain_alloc_user(idev->dev, NULL,
> > NULL);
> > + else
> > + hwpt->domain = iommu_domain_alloc(idev->dev->bus);
>
> this reminds the comment for @domain_alloc_user() should clarify
> that UNMANGED domain type is assumed when no user data is
> provided, to be compatible with iommu_domain_alloc().
Yes. Perhaps:
* @domain_alloc_user: allocate user iommu domain. A valid user_data pointer and
* a parent pointer to a kernel-managed domain are required
* to allocate an IOMMU_DOMAIN_NESTED domain. Otherwise, the
* new domain will be set to an IOMMU_DOMAIN_UNMANAGED type.
Thanks
Nic
Powered by blists - more mailing lists