[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d6f2d05f-5dc2-3239-e4e6-299397a61ca0@acm.org>
Date: Fri, 19 May 2023 15:20:39 -0700
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
To: Kiwoong Kim <kwmad.kim@...sung.com>, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, alim.akhtar@...sung.com,
avri.altman@....com, jejb@...ux.ibm.com,
martin.petersen@...cle.com, beanhuo@...ron.com,
adrian.hunter@...el.com, sc.suh@...sung.com, hy50.seo@...sung.com,
sh425.lee@...sung.com, kwangwon.min@...sung.com,
junwoo80.lee@...sung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] ufs: poll pmc until another pa request is completed
On 5/15/23 20:52, Kiwoong Kim wrote:
> + spin_lock_irqsave(hba->host->host_lock, flags);
> + hba->active_uic_cmd = NULL;
> + if (ufshcd_is_link_broken(hba)) {
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(hba->host->host_lock, flags);
> + ret = -ENOLINK;
> + goto out;
> + }
> + hba->uic_async_done = cnf;
> + cmd->argument2 = 0;
> + cmd->argument3 = mode;
> + ret = __ufshcd_send_uic_cmd(hba, cmd, true);
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(hba->host->host_lock, flags);
Please consider adding lockdep_assert_held(&hba->uic_cmd_mutex) near
the start of __ufshcd_poll_uic_pwr() to document that this function is
serialized against other contexts that submit an UIC.
Additionally, I don't think that it is necessary to hold the host lock
around the ufshcd_is_link_broken() or __ufshcd_send_uic_cmd() calls.
Thanks,
Bart.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists