linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 1/7] rust: workqueue: add low-level workqueue bindings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230519094042.3432952-1-aliceryhl@google.com>
Date:   Fri, 19 May 2023 09:40:42 +0000
From:   Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>
To:     yakoyoku@...il.com
Cc:     alex.gaynor@...il.com, aliceryhl@...gle.com,
        benno.lossin@...ton.me, bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com,
        boqun.feng@...il.com, gary@...yguo.net, jiangshanlai@...il.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ojeda@...nel.org,
        patches@...ts.linux.dev, rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org,
        tj@...nel.org, wedsonaf@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/7] rust: workqueue: add low-level workqueue bindings

On 5/18/23 16:51, Martin Rodriguez Reboredo wrote:
> On 5/17/23 17:31, Alice Ryhl wrote:
>> +    /// Enqueues a work item.
>> +    ///
>> +    /// This may fail if the work item is already enqueued in a workqueue.
>
> Wouldn't be worth to mention that, if not implied, the item it's going
> to be worked on an unbound CPU?

I'm not really sure what you mean. Can you elaborate?

Alice