linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 1/7] rust: workqueue: add low-level workqueue bindings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <beb2932e-7f16-e368-9cb5-edbe115fcb67@gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 19 May 2023 09:04:38 -0300
From:   Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@...il.com>
To:     Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>
Cc:     alex.gaynor@...il.com, benno.lossin@...ton.me,
        bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com, boqun.feng@...il.com, gary@...yguo.net,
        jiangshanlai@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        ojeda@...nel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
        rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, tj@...nel.org, wedsonaf@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/7] rust: workqueue: add low-level workqueue bindings

On 5/19/23 06:40, Alice Ryhl wrote:
> On 5/18/23 16:51, Martin Rodriguez Reboredo wrote:
>> On 5/17/23 17:31, Alice Ryhl wrote:
>>> +    /// Enqueues a work item.
>>> +    ///
>>> +    /// This may fail if the work item is already enqueued in a workqueue.
>>
>> Wouldn't be worth to mention that, if not implied, the item it's going
>> to be worked on an unbound CPU?
> 
> I'm not really sure what you mean. Can you elaborate?
> 
> Alice

I've meant that if it's good to mention that `queue_work_on` is going
to be called with `WORK_CPU_UNBOUND` so that API users know about it.