[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230521100818.GA29408@1wt.eu>
Date: Sun, 21 May 2023 12:08:18 +0200
From: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
To: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@...ssschuh.net>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
llvm@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] tools/nolibc: autodetect stackprotector availability
from compiler
Hi Thomas,
On Sun, May 21, 2023 at 11:36:28AM +0200, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> As suggested by Willy it is possible to detect the availability of
> stackprotector via preprocessor defines.
> Make use of that to simplify the code and interface of nolibc.
I have just had a quick glance over it and not tested it yet, but
overall I really like it, thank you! I'll try to give you some
feedback today (or simply merge it).
Willy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists