[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ccd8a189-0ca1-4462-8478-87b6c6ccb066@t-8ch.de>
Date: Sun, 21 May 2023 12:36:01 +0200
From: Thomas Weißschuh <thomas@...ch.de>
To: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
llvm@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] tools/nolibc: simplify stackprotector compiler flags
On 2023-05-21 11:36:35+0200, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> Now that nolibc enable stackprotector support automatically when the
> compiler enables it we only have to get the -fstack-protector flags
> correct.
>
> The cc-options are structured so that -fstack-protector-all is only
> enabled if -mstack-protector=guard works, as that is the only mode
> supported by nolibc.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@...ssschuh.net>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/Makefile | 13 ++-----------
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/Makefile
> index bd41102ea299..445c352b1b33 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/Makefile
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/Makefile
> @@ -76,20 +76,11 @@ else
> Q=@
> endif
>
> -CFLAGS_STACKPROTECTOR = -DNOLIBC_STACKPROTECTOR \
> - $(call cc-option,-mstack-protector-guard=global) \
> - $(call cc-option,-fstack-protector-all)
> -CFLAGS_STKP_i386 = $(CFLAGS_STACKPROTECTOR)
> -CFLAGS_STKP_x86_64 = $(CFLAGS_STACKPROTECTOR)
> -CFLAGS_STKP_x86 = $(CFLAGS_STACKPROTECTOR)
> -CFLAGS_STKP_arm64 = $(CFLAGS_STACKPROTECTOR)
> -CFLAGS_STKP_arm = $(CFLAGS_STACKPROTECTOR)
> -CFLAGS_STKP_mips = $(CFLAGS_STACKPROTECTOR)
> -CFLAGS_STKP_riscv = $(CFLAGS_STACKPROTECTOR)
> -CFLAGS_STKP_loongarch = $(CFLAGS_STACKPROTECTOR)
> +CFLAGS_STACKPROTECTOR = $(call cc-option,-mstack-protector-guard=global -fstack-protector-all)
> CFLAGS_s390 = -m64
> CFLAGS ?= -Os -fno-ident -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables -std=c89 \
> $(call cc-option,-fno-stack-protector) \
> + $(call cc-option,-mstack-protector-guard=global $(call cc-option,-fstack-protector-all)) \
> $(CFLAGS_STKP_$(ARCH)) $(CFLAGS_$(ARCH))
> LDFLAGS := -s
I noticed, of course after having sent the series, that the cleanup here
was not done properly.
CFLAGS_STACKPROTECTOR and CFLAGS_STKP should be deleted completely.
This will be fixed in v2, or feel free to fix it up when applying the
series.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists