[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87a5xwifxl.wl-tiwai@suse.de>
Date: Mon, 22 May 2023 16:44:38 +0200
From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
To: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 32/44] sound: add HAS_IOPORT dependencies
On Mon, 22 May 2023 15:54:36 +0200,
Niklas Schnelle wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2023-05-22 at 13:59 +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > On Mon, 22 May 2023 12:50:37 +0200,
> > Niklas Schnelle wrote:
> > >
> > > In a future patch HAS_IOPORT=n will result in inb()/outb() and friends
> > > not being declared. We thus need to add HAS_IOPORT as dependency for
> > > those drivers using them.
> > >
> > > Co-developed-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
> > > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
> > > Signed-off-by: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@...ux.ibm.com>
> >
> > Looks good to me. Would you like the patch picked up through
> > sound.git tree, or rather apply all through a different tree?
> > In the latter case:
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
> >
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > Takashi
>
> With the Kconfig addition of HAS_IOPORT merged in v6.4-rc1 this patch
> can now go independently via the the sound.git tree. Our plan is to get
> as many of these per-subsystem patches merged for v6.5 as possible such
> that then only a small number (ideally zero) of patches remain before
> the last one can be merged removing inb()/outb() etc for HAS_IOPORT=n.
OK, then I applied the patch now on for-next branch.
Thanks!
Takashi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists