[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <SJ1PR12MB6339C29CB538C4FD54B72810C0439@SJ1PR12MB6339.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 22 May 2023 14:57:31 +0000
From: Akhil R <akhilrajeev@...dia.com>
To: "christian.koenig@....com" <christian.koenig@....com>,
"digetx@...il.com" <digetx@...il.com>,
Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>,
"linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org" <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
"sumit.semwal@...aro.org" <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>,
"thierry.reding@...il.com" <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
"wsa@...nel.org" <wsa@...nel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v6 RESEND 2/2] i2c: tegra: Share same DMA channel for RX
and TX
> Allocate only one DMA channel for I2C and share it for both TX and RX
> instead of using two different DMA hardware channels with the same
> slave ID. Since I2C supports only half duplex, there is no impact on
> perf with this.
>
> Signed-off-by: Akhil R <akhilrajeev@...dia.com>
> Acked-by: Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>
> ---
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-tegra.c | 69 ++++++++++------------------------
> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 49 deletions(-)
>
Hi Wolfram,
Thanks for applying the patch 1/2 of this series.
I saw that this patch is not applied currently.
Do we have any concerns on applying this?
Regards,
Akhil
Powered by blists - more mailing lists