[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZH2a+S/1yeV5gN07@shikoro>
Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2023 10:21:13 +0200
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>
To: Akhil R <akhilrajeev@...dia.com>
Cc: christian.koenig@....com, digetx@...il.com, jonathanh@...dia.com,
ldewangan@...dia.com, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
sumit.semwal@...aro.org, thierry.reding@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 RESEND 2/2] i2c: tegra: Share same DMA channel for RX
and TX
On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 06:09:15PM +0530, Akhil R wrote:
> Allocate only one DMA channel for I2C and share it for both TX and RX
> instead of using two different DMA hardware channels with the same
> slave ID. Since I2C supports only half duplex, there is no impact on
> perf with this.
>
> Signed-off-by: Akhil R <akhilrajeev@...dia.com>
> Acked-by: Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>
Applied to for-next, thanks!
No, there wasn't an issue with this patch. I just needed to make sure
patch 1 (which was for-current material) landed upstream to avoid merge
conflicts.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists