[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87wn10ufj9.ffs@tglx>
Date: Tue, 23 May 2023 01:12:26 +0200
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, x86@...nel.org,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
Arjan van de Veen <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Paul McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@...alenko.name>,
Paul Menzel <pmenzel@...gen.mpg.de>,
"Guilherme G. Piccoli" <gpiccoli@...lia.com>,
Piotr Gorski <lucjan.lucjanov@...il.com>,
Usama Arif <usama.arif@...edance.com>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>,
linux-csky@...r.kernel.org,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
Helge Deller <deller@....de>, linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Sabin Rapan <sabrapan@...zon.com>,
"Michael Kelley (LINUX)" <mikelley@...rosoft.com>,
Ross Philipson <ross.philipson@...cle.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw@...zon.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [patch V4 33/37] cpu/hotplug: Allow "parallel" bringup up to
CPUHP_BP_KICK_AP_STATE
On Mon, May 22 2023 at 23:27, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 11:04:17PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>
>> That does not make any sense at all and my tired brain does not help
>> either.
>
>> Can you please apply the below debug patch and provide the output?
>
> Here's the log, a quick glance says the
>
> if (!--ncpus)
> break;
>
> check is doing the wrong thing
Obviously.
Let me find a brown paperbag and go to sleep before I even try to
compile the obvious fix.
---
diff --git a/kernel/cpu.c b/kernel/cpu.c
index 005f863a3d2b..88a7ede322bd 100644
--- a/kernel/cpu.c
+++ b/kernel/cpu.c
@@ -1770,9 +1770,6 @@ static void __init cpuhp_bringup_mask(const struct cpumask *mask, unsigned int n
for_each_cpu(cpu, mask) {
struct cpuhp_cpu_state *st = per_cpu_ptr(&cpuhp_state, cpu);
- if (!--ncpus)
- break;
-
if (cpu_up(cpu, target) && can_rollback_cpu(st)) {
/*
* If this failed then cpu_up() might have only
@@ -1781,6 +1778,9 @@ static void __init cpuhp_bringup_mask(const struct cpumask *mask, unsigned int n
*/
WARN_ON(cpuhp_invoke_callback_range(false, cpu, st, CPUHP_OFFLINE));
}
+
+ if (!--ncpus)
+ break;
}
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists