[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1e8c3e92-4043-11f2-e7a7-0bf4273c65d8@loongson.cn>
Date: Mon, 22 May 2023 21:07:47 +0800
From: zhuyinbo <zhuyinbo@...ngson.cn>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jianmin Lv <lvjianmin@...ngson.cn>,
wanghongliang@...ngson.cn, Liu Peibao <liupeibao@...ngson.cn>,
loongson-kernel@...ts.loongnix.cn, zhuyinbo@...ngson.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 0/2] spi: loongson: add bus driver for the loongson
spi
在 2023/5/22 下午7:56, Mark Brown 写道:
> On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 07:44:49PM +0800, zhuyinbo wrote:
>
>> The recently patch was as follows, It seems no issue for patch apply
>> them, Maybe it is the 0/2 patch issue ? this 0/2 patch wasn't a valid
>> patch and it need was skipped.
>
> What's causing problem is that you patched MAINTAINERS in both patches
> but also used the wrong subject line for the first patch so I was having
> to fix it up by hand every time.
Hi Mark,
I learn about what you said that bindings patch and spi driver change a
same MAINTAINERS file, but It seems not cause apply fail if the patch
series apply in order. I'm sorry, I don't understand the reason why my
spi series patch apply failed, then I have a look about your spi ci
tree and that what I need to do is just change the title of [1/2] patch
like this in next version ? Correcting the title can solve the problem
of patch series apply failure in your tree ? actually, I don't reproduce
that apply faile issue in your current spi tree and for-next branch.
spi: add loongson spi bindings
Thanks
Yinbo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists