[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cb69dbab-0966-8ecb-d9b9-017f430fd7ea@baylibre.com>
Date: Tue, 23 May 2023 18:26:07 +0200
From: Alexandre Mergnat <amergnat@...libre.com>
To: Trevor Wu <trevor.wu@...iatek.com>, broonie@...nel.org,
lgirdwood@...il.com, tiwai@...e.com, perex@...ex.cz,
robh+dt@...nel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org,
conor+dt@...nel.org, matthias.bgg@...il.com,
angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com
Cc: alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/7] ASoC: dt-bindings: mediatek,mt8188-mt6359: remove
ADDA_BE from link-name
On 23/05/2023 04:19, Trevor Wu wrote:
> ADDA_BE is used to connect to mt6359. For machine mt8188-mt6359, codec
> for ADDA_BE must be mt6359 which are configured on the machine driver.
> Besides, ADDA_BE is divided into two dais, UL_SRC_BE and DL_SRC_BE.
> As a result, remove ADDA_BE from items of link-name.
>
> Signed-off-by: Trevor Wu<trevor.wu@...iatek.com>
I don't understand how "DL_SRC_BE" and "UL_SRC_BE" links are done.
Why these dais don't replace "ADDA_BE" in this binding ?
Regards,
Alexandre
Powered by blists - more mailing lists