[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZGzpa5HVVCKzQu3E@surfacebook>
Date: Tue, 23 May 2023 19:27:23 +0300
From: andy.shevchenko@...il.com
To: Ryan.Wanner@...rochip.com
Cc: robh+dt@...nel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org,
conor+dt@...nel.org, nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com,
alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com, claudiu.beznea@...rochip.com,
linus.walleij@...aro.org, ludovic.desroches@...rochip.com,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] pinctrl: at91-pio4: Enable Push-Pull configuration
Wed, May 17, 2023 at 01:54:04PM +0200, Ryan.Wanner@...rochip.com kirjoitti:
> From: Ryan Wanner <Ryan.Wanner@...rochip.com>
>
> Enable push-pull configuration. Remove integer value argument from
> open-drain configuration as it is discarded when pinconf function is
> called from gpiolib. Add push-pull do debug and get functions.
Right, thank you for fixing this!
Other comments below.
...
> + case PIN_CONFIG_DRIVE_PUSH_PULL:
> + conf &= (~ATMEL_PIO_OPD_MASK);
Parentheses are redundant.
> break;
...
> if (conf & ATMEL_PIO_OPD_MASK)
> seq_printf(s, "%s ", "open-drain");
> + if (!(conf & ATMEL_PIO_OPD_MASK))
> + seq_printf(s, "%s ", "push-pull");
As commented already by others, the else would be better.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists