[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230523-clergyman-reputably-21f69cd98797@spud>
Date: Tue, 23 May 2023 17:44:02 +0100
From: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
To: Varadarajan Narayanan <quic_varada@...cinc.com>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
agross@...nel.org, andersson@...nel.org, konrad.dybcio@...aro.org,
amitk@...nel.org, thara.gopinath@...il.com, rafael@...nel.org,
daniel.lezcano@...aro.org, rui.zhang@...el.com, robh+dt@...nel.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Praveenkumar I <quic_ipkumar@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] dt-bindings: thermal: tsens: Add ipq9574
compatible
On Tue, May 23, 2023 at 03:49:04PM +0530, Varadarajan Narayanan wrote:
> On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 01:06:49PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > On 18/05/2023 11:05, Varadarajan Narayanan wrote:
> > > On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 09:09:12AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > >> On 18/05/2023 07:40, Varadarajan Narayanan wrote:
> > >>> On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 09:00:49AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > >>>> On 17/05/2023 07:57, Varadarajan Narayanan wrote:
> > It's not true. The error you see is result because you removed something
> > you should not. I did not ask you to remove anything. So repeating -
> > "add new item". Adding is not "removal and adding". Adding is just "adding".
>
> See below for the changes that were tried and the corresponding errors.
>
> (1) No lines removed
>
> @@ -66,6 +66,7 @@
> - description: v2 of TSENS with combined interrupt
> enum:
> - qcom,ipq8074-tsens
> + - qcom,ipq9574-tsens
>
> reg:
> items:
>
> dt_binding_check: No errors
>
> dtbs_check :
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574-rdp433.dtb: thermal-sensor@...000: compatible: 'oneOf' conditional failed, one must be fixed:
> ['qcom,ipq9574-tsens', 'qcom,ipq8074-tsens'] is too long
Which I figure you understand makes sense.
> (2) No lines removed
>
> @@ -66,6 +66,8 @@
> - description: v2 of TSENS with combined interrupt
> enum:
> - qcom,ipq8074-tsens
> + - qcom,ipq9574-tsens
> + - const: qcom,ipq8074-tsens
>
> reg:
> items:
>
> dt_binding_check: No errors
>
> dtbs_check : Gives errors for all the DTS files that have tsens-v0_1, tsens-v2, tsens-v1. Copy pasted a sample for each one of them
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8916-huawei-g7.dtb: /soc@...hermal-sensor@...000: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['qcom,msm8916-tsens', 'qcom,tsens-v0_1']
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8953-xiaomi-tissot.dtb: /soc@...hermal-sensor@...000: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['qcom,msm8953-tsens', 'qcom,tsens-v2']
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8956-sony-xperia-loire-suzu.dtb: /soc@...hermal-sensor@...000: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['qcom,msm8956-tsens', 'qcom,tsens-v1']
I think you've missed an earlier error that points out the entire
binding is invalid.
> (3) No lines removed
> @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
> properties:
> compatible:
> oneOf:
> + - const: qcom,ipq8074-tsens
> - description: msm8960 TSENS based
> items:
> - enum:
> @@ -66,6 +67,8 @@
> - description: v2 of TSENS with combined interrupt
> enum:
> - qcom,ipq8074-tsens
> + - qcom,ipq9574-tsens
> + - const: qcom,ipq8074-tsens
>
> reg:
> items:
>
> dt_binding_check: Same as above
>
> dtbs_check : Same as above
Ditto here.
> (4) Change 8074 from enum to const
> @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
> properties:
> compatible:
> oneOf:
> + - const: qcom,ipq8074-tsens
> - description: msm8960 TSENS based
> items:
> - enum:
> @@ -64,8 +65,10 @@
> - const: qcom,tsens-v2
>
> - description: v2 of TSENS with combined interrupt
> - enum:
> - - qcom,ipq8074-tsens
> + items:
> + - enum:
> + - qcom,ipq9574-tsens
> + - const: qcom,ipq8074-tsens
>
> reg:
> items:
>
> dt_binding_check: No errors
>
> dtbs_check : No errors
>
> But (4) doesn't seem acceptable. Any other alternative to resolve this?
It now has a "random" entry up at the top w/ no description, not
matching the existing style. Can you just fix that up & send a v(N+1)
so that the discussion can restart in a less confusing way? I am trying
to fill in for Krzysztof but I am struggling to follow the thread.
Thanks,
Conor.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists