[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230524064307.GA5052@varda-linux.qualcomm.com>
Date: Wed, 24 May 2023 12:13:08 +0530
From: Varadarajan Narayanan <quic_varada@...cinc.com>
To: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
CC: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
<agross@...nel.org>, <andersson@...nel.org>,
<konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>, <amitk@...nel.org>,
<thara.gopinath@...il.com>, <rafael@...nel.org>,
<daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>, <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
<robh+dt@...nel.org>, <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Praveenkumar I <quic_ipkumar@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] dt-bindings: thermal: tsens: Add ipq9574
compatible
On Tue, May 23, 2023 at 05:44:02PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Tue, May 23, 2023 at 03:49:04PM +0530, Varadarajan Narayanan wrote:
> > On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 01:06:49PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > > On 18/05/2023 11:05, Varadarajan Narayanan wrote:
> > > > On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 09:09:12AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > > >> On 18/05/2023 07:40, Varadarajan Narayanan wrote:
> > > >>> On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 09:00:49AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > > >>>> On 17/05/2023 07:57, Varadarajan Narayanan wrote:
>
> > > It's not true. The error you see is result because you removed something
> > > you should not. I did not ask you to remove anything. So repeating -
> > > "add new item". Adding is not "removal and adding". Adding is just "adding".
> >
> > See below for the changes that were tried and the corresponding errors.
> >
> > (1) No lines removed
> >
> > @@ -66,6 +66,7 @@
> > - description: v2 of TSENS with combined interrupt
> > enum:
> > - qcom,ipq8074-tsens
> > + - qcom,ipq9574-tsens
> >
> > reg:
> > items:
> >
> > dt_binding_check: No errors
> >
> > dtbs_check :
> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574-rdp433.dtb: thermal-sensor@...000: compatible: 'oneOf' conditional failed, one must be fixed:
> > ['qcom,ipq9574-tsens', 'qcom,ipq8074-tsens'] is too long
>
> Which I figure you understand makes sense.
>
> > (2) No lines removed
> >
> > @@ -66,6 +66,8 @@
> > - description: v2 of TSENS with combined interrupt
> > enum:
> > - qcom,ipq8074-tsens
> > + - qcom,ipq9574-tsens
> > + - const: qcom,ipq8074-tsens
> >
> > reg:
> > items:
> >
> > dt_binding_check: No errors
> >
> > dtbs_check : Gives errors for all the DTS files that have tsens-v0_1, tsens-v2, tsens-v1. Copy pasted a sample for each one of them
> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8916-huawei-g7.dtb: /soc@...hermal-sensor@...000: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['qcom,msm8916-tsens', 'qcom,tsens-v0_1']
> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8953-xiaomi-tissot.dtb: /soc@...hermal-sensor@...000: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['qcom,msm8953-tsens', 'qcom,tsens-v2']
> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8956-sony-xperia-loire-suzu.dtb: /soc@...hermal-sensor@...000: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['qcom,msm8956-tsens', 'qcom,tsens-v1']
>
> I think you've missed an earlier error that points out the entire
> binding is invalid.
>
> > (3) No lines removed
> > @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
> > properties:
> > compatible:
> > oneOf:
> > + - const: qcom,ipq8074-tsens
> > - description: msm8960 TSENS based
> > items:
> > - enum:
> > @@ -66,6 +67,8 @@
> > - description: v2 of TSENS with combined interrupt
> > enum:
> > - qcom,ipq8074-tsens
> > + - qcom,ipq9574-tsens
> > + - const: qcom,ipq8074-tsens
> >
> > reg:
> > items:
> >
> > dt_binding_check: Same as above
> >
> > dtbs_check : Same as above
>
> Ditto here.
>
> > (4) Change 8074 from enum to const
> > @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
> > properties:
> > compatible:
> > oneOf:
> > + - const: qcom,ipq8074-tsens
> > - description: msm8960 TSENS based
> > items:
> > - enum:
> > @@ -64,8 +65,10 @@
> > - const: qcom,tsens-v2
> >
> > - description: v2 of TSENS with combined interrupt
> > - enum:
> > - - qcom,ipq8074-tsens
> > + items:
> > + - enum:
> > + - qcom,ipq9574-tsens
> > + - const: qcom,ipq8074-tsens
> >
> > reg:
> > items:
> >
> > dt_binding_check: No errors
> >
> > dtbs_check : No errors
> >
> > But (4) doesn't seem acceptable. Any other alternative to resolve this?
>
> It now has a "random" entry up at the top w/ no description, not
> matching the existing style. Can you just fix that up & send a v(N+1)
> so that the discussion can restart in a less confusing way? I am trying
> to fill in for Krzysztof but I am struggling to follow the thread.
Sure. Will post the next version.
Thanks
Varada
Powered by blists - more mailing lists