lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230523-unfailing-twisting-9cb092b14f6f@spud>
Date:   Tue, 23 May 2023 23:54:57 +0100
From:   Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
To:     Justin Chen <justin.chen@...adcom.com>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com, justinpopo6@...il.com,
        f.fainelli@...il.com, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
        kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, opendmb@...il.com,
        andrew@...n.ch, hkallweit1@...il.com, linux@...linux.org.uk,
        richardcochran@...il.com, sumit.semwal@...aro.org,
        christian.koenig@....com, simon.horman@...igine.com,
        Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@...adcom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 2/6] dt-bindings: net: Brcm ASP 2.0 Ethernet
 controller

Hey Justin,

On Tue, May 23, 2023 at 02:53:43PM -0700, Justin Chen wrote:

> +  compatible:
> +    enum:
> +      - brcm,asp-v2.0
> +      - brcm,bcm72165-asp
> +      - brcm,asp-v2.1
> +      - brcm,bcm74165-asp

> +        compatible = "brcm,bcm72165-asp", "brcm,asp-v2.0";

You can't do this, as Rob's bot has pointed out. Please test the
bindings :( You need one of these type of constructs:

compatible:
  oneOf:
    - items:
        - const: brcm,bcm72165-asp
        - const: brcm,asp-v2.0
    - items:
        - const: brcm,bcm74165-asp
        - const: brcm,asp-v2.1

Although, given either you or Florian said there are likely to be
multiple parts, going for an enum, rather than const for the brcm,bcm..
entry will prevent some churn. Up to you.

Cheers,
Conor.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ