[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <dc4834cb-fadf-17a5-fbc7-cf500db88f20@axentia.se>
Date: Tue, 23 May 2023 14:42:08 +0200
From: Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@...rochip.com>,
Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...aro.org>,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, dmaengine@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] dmaengine: at_hdmac: Regression fix and cleanup
Hi!
I found a regression in DMA handling on one of our SAMA5D3 boards.
While combing through the regressing commit, a found two unrelated
strange things. The first is the actually problematic change. The
second is a number of suspect defines, that I fail to see how they
can ever do any good.
Cheers,
Peter
Peter Rosin (2):
dmaengine: at_hdmac: Repair bitfield macros for peripheral ID handling
dmaengine: at_hdmac: Remove unused field values that do not fit
drivers/dma/at_hdmac.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
--
2.20.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists