linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/4] platform/x86: think-lmi: Correct System password interface

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <9e748368-1af6-45a4-8e33-34f056e3b473@app.fastmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 23 May 2023 08:43:04 -0400
From:   "Mark Pearson" <mpearson-lenovo@...ebb.ca>
To:     "Hans de Goede" <hdegoede@...hat.com>
Cc:     "markgross@...nel.org" <markgross@...nel.org>,
        "platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org" 
        <platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] platform/x86: think-lmi: Correct System password interface

Thanks Hans

On Tue, May 23, 2023, at 6:46 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> On 5/17/23 20:19, Mark Pearson wrote:
>> The system password identification was incorrect. This means that if
>> the password was enabled it wouldn't be detected correctly; and setting
>> it would not work.
>> 
>> Correct these mistakes.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Mark Pearson <mpearson-lenovo@...ebb.ca>
>> ---
>>  drivers/platform/x86/think-lmi.c | 4 ++--
>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/think-lmi.c b/drivers/platform/x86/think-lmi.c
>> index d9341305eba9..b8431d3b137f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/think-lmi.c
>> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/think-lmi.c
>> @@ -171,7 +171,7 @@ MODULE_PARM_DESC(debug_support, "Enable debug command support");
>>  #define TLMI_POP_PWD (1 << 0)
>>  #define TLMI_PAP_PWD (1 << 1)
>>  #define TLMI_HDD_PWD (1 << 2)
>> -#define TLMI_SYS_PWD (1 << 3)
>> +#define TLMI_SYS_PWD (1 << 6)
>>  #define TLMI_CERT    (1 << 7)
>>  
>>  #define to_tlmi_pwd_setting(kobj)  container_of(kobj, struct tlmi_pwd_setting, kobj)
>> @@ -1504,7 +1504,7 @@ static int tlmi_analyze(void)
>>  		tlmi_priv.pwd_power->valid = true;
>>  
>>  	if (tlmi_priv.opcode_support) {
>> -		tlmi_priv.pwd_system = tlmi_create_auth("sys", "system");
>> +		tlmi_priv.pwd_system = tlmi_create_auth("smp", "system");
>
> "smp" ?

Yes - that is what is common across all the platforms.
https://docs.lenovocdrt.com/#/bios/wmi/wmi_guide?id=change-a-bios-password

I never quite got a straight answer on the origins of the 'sys' account - I think it may have been originally intended but never used? Or maybe it's always been wrong.

I should change the define to be TLMI_SMP_PWD instead actually for clarity. I'll fix that.

>
> Also this is not explained in the commit message.
>

Ack - will update the commit message to include this.

Thanks
Mark