lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1cf8ac78-e036-69ef-3d1d-74b0a0825bb2@redhat.com>
Date:   Tue, 23 May 2023 15:27:05 +0200
From:   Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
To:     Mark Pearson <mpearson-lenovo@...ebb.ca>
Cc:     "markgross@...nel.org" <markgross@...nel.org>,
        "platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org" 
        <platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] platform/x86: think-lmi: Correct System password
 interface

Hi,

On 5/23/23 14:43, Mark Pearson wrote:
> Thanks Hans
> 
> On Tue, May 23, 2023, at 6:46 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> Hi Mark,
>>
>> On 5/17/23 20:19, Mark Pearson wrote:
>>> The system password identification was incorrect. This means that if
>>> the password was enabled it wouldn't be detected correctly; and setting
>>> it would not work.
>>>
>>> Correct these mistakes.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Mark Pearson <mpearson-lenovo@...ebb.ca>
>>> ---
>>>  drivers/platform/x86/think-lmi.c | 4 ++--
>>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/think-lmi.c b/drivers/platform/x86/think-lmi.c
>>> index d9341305eba9..b8431d3b137f 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/think-lmi.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/think-lmi.c
>>> @@ -171,7 +171,7 @@ MODULE_PARM_DESC(debug_support, "Enable debug command support");
>>>  #define TLMI_POP_PWD (1 << 0)
>>>  #define TLMI_PAP_PWD (1 << 1)
>>>  #define TLMI_HDD_PWD (1 << 2)
>>> -#define TLMI_SYS_PWD (1 << 3)
>>> +#define TLMI_SYS_PWD (1 << 6)
>>>  #define TLMI_CERT    (1 << 7)
>>>  
>>>  #define to_tlmi_pwd_setting(kobj)  container_of(kobj, struct tlmi_pwd_setting, kobj)
>>> @@ -1504,7 +1504,7 @@ static int tlmi_analyze(void)
>>>  		tlmi_priv.pwd_power->valid = true;
>>>  
>>>  	if (tlmi_priv.opcode_support) {
>>> -		tlmi_priv.pwd_system = tlmi_create_auth("sys", "system");
>>> +		tlmi_priv.pwd_system = tlmi_create_auth("smp", "system");
>>
>> "smp" ?
> 
> Yes - that is what is common across all the platforms.
> https://docs.lenovocdrt.com/#/bios/wmi/wmi_guide?id=change-a-bios-password

Ok, so smp stands for System Management Password I guess ? Might be good to spell
that out somehwere, e.g. in a comment.

Regards,

Hans



> 
> I never quite got a straight answer on the origins of the 'sys' account - I think it may have been originally intended but never used? Or maybe it's always been wrong.
> 
> I should change the define to be TLMI_SMP_PWD instead actually for clarity. I'll fix that.
> 
>>
>> Also this is not explained in the commit message.
>>
> 
> Ack - will update the commit message to include this.
> 
> Thanks
> Mark
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ