[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAD=FV=W5HrBFakvoX-cQ5G=4xV1upkFPZ6aSR8me+d+aCpirgg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 May 2023 07:12:07 -0700
From: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To: Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, pmladek@...e.com, kernelfans@...il.com,
lecopzer.chen@...iatek.com, ldufour@...ux.ibm.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] watchdog: set variables watchdog_soft,hardlockup_user_enabled
storage-class-specifier to static
Hi,
On Tue, May 23, 2023 at 5:23 AM Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> smatch reports
> kernel/watchdog.c:40:19: warning: symbol
> 'watchdog_hardlockup_user_enabled' was not declared. Should it be static?
> kernel/watchdog.c:41:19: warning: symbol
> 'watchdog_softlockup_user_enabled' was not declared. Should it be static?
>
> These variabled are only used in their defining file, so it should be static.
s/variabled/variables
>
> Signed-off-by: Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>
> ---
> kernel/watchdog.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
While your fix is valid (thanks!), it's only half the fix.
I wondered why smatch would have suddenly noticed this since the
change that touched this variable recently was only a rename. When I
dug deeper, I realized that the old names actually _were_ referenced
outside this file and my rename missed them. The reason I missed them
is that the only reference is an "extern" reference in
`include/linux/nmi.h`. The references in `include/linux/nmi.h`
probably should have been removed in commit dd0693fdf054 ("watchdog:
move watchdog sysctl interface to watchdog.c")
...so a more complete fix would also remove references to the old
names (nmi_watchdog_user_enabled and soft_watchdog_user_enabled) in
`include/linux/nmi.h`.
-Doug
Powered by blists - more mailing lists