[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d0fe7a6f-8cd9-0b81-758a-f3b444e74bab@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 23 May 2023 07:16:55 -0700
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>, keescook@...omium.org,
yzaikin@...gle.com, ebiederm@...ssion.com, arnd@...db.de,
bp@...en8.de, James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com, deller@....de,
tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
x86@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com, luto@...nel.org,
peterz@...radead.org, brgerst@...il.com,
christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr, kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com,
jroedel@...e.de
Cc: j.granados@...sung.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
willy@...radead.org, linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] signal: move show_unhandled_signals sysctl to its own
file
On 5/22/23 14:08, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/umip.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/umip.c
> @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
> #include <asm/insn.h>
> #include <asm/insn-eval.h>
> #include <linux/ratelimit.h>
> +#include <linux/signal.h>
Oh, so this is actually fixing a bug: umip.c uses
'show_unhandled_signals' but it doesn't explicitly include
linux/signal.h where 'show_unhandled_signals' is declared.
It doesn't actually have anything to do with moving the
show_unhandled_signals sysctl, right?
If that's the case, it would be nice to have this in its own patch.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists