lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <CSU61T6XP2L8.3RHK45A4J0C2C@suppilovahvero>
Date:   Wed, 24 May 2023 05:52:29 +0300
From:   "Jarkko Sakkinen" <jarkko@...nel.org>
To:     "Paul Menzel" <pmenzel@...gen.mpg.de>,
        "Peijie Shao" <shaopeijie@...tc.cn>
Cc:     <peterhuewe@....de>, <jgg@...pe.ca>,
        <linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] tpm_tis_spi: fix:release chip select when flow
 control fails

On Mon May 22, 2023 at 11:17 AM EEST, Paul Menzel wrote:
> Dear Peijie,
>
>
> Thank you for your patch.
>
> The fix: tag in your commit message summary is uncommon. I suggest:
>
> > tpm_tis_spi: Release chip select when flow control fails
>
>
> Am 22.05.23 um 09:01 schrieb shaopeijie@...tc.cn:
> > From: Peijie Shao <shaopeijie@...tc.cn>
> > 
> > The failure paths in tpm_tis_spi_transfer() do not deactivate
> > chip select. Send an empty message (cs_select == 0) to overcome
> > this.
>
> Does the standard require to deactivate it?
>
> A note on your test setup would be nice to have in the commit message.

I think it is "good enough", not to say it couldn't be improved.

I can accept as it is, or substitute with one with an updated commit
message. This is going earliest to v6.5.

BR, Jarkko

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ