[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230525040038.12346-1-qiang.zhang1211@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 May 2023 12:00:38 +0800
From: Zqiang <qiang.zhang1211@...il.com>
To: tj@...nel.org, jiangshanlai@...il.com, qiang.zhang1211@...il.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] workqueue: Do not set CPU_INTENSIVE worker flags with wq_cpu_intensive_thresh_us=0
If the system start with workqueue.cpu_intensive_thresh_us=0, for running
per-cpu worker, the CPU_INTENSIVE flag will be set unconditionally in
wq_worker_tick(), this commit therefore disable set CPU_INTENSIVE and
directly return when workqueue.cpu_intensive_thresh_us=0.
Signed-off-by: Zqiang <qiang.zhang1211@...il.com>
---
[ 17.359725] workqueue: process_srcu hogged CPU for >0us 4 times, consider switching to WQ_UNBOUND
[ 19.752679] workqueue: gc_worker hogged CPU for >0us 4 times, consider switching to WQ_UNBOUND
[ 19.796721] workqueue: gc_worker hogged CPU for >0us 8 times, consider switching to WQ_UNBOUND
[ 21.992637] workqueue: wait_rcu_exp_gp hogged CPU for >0us 4 times, consider switching to WQ_UNBOUND
[ 27.143632] workqueue: kfree_rcu_monitor hogged CPU for >0us 4 times, consider switching to WQ_UNBOUND
[ 27.143647] workqueue: kfree_rcu_monitor hogged CPU for >0us 8 times, consider switching to WQ_UNBOUND
[ 38.472708] workqueue: reg_todo hogged CPU for >0us 4 times, consider switching to WQ_UNBOUND
kernel/workqueue.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index c4f4ca0bd2af..eaea5386859e 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -1152,6 +1152,7 @@ void wq_worker_tick(struct task_struct *task)
* We probably want to make this prettier in the future.
*/
if ((worker->flags & WORKER_NOT_RUNNING) || READ_ONCE(worker->sleeping) ||
+ !wq_cpu_intensive_thresh_us ||
worker->task->se.sum_exec_runtime - worker->current_at <
wq_cpu_intensive_thresh_us * NSEC_PER_USEC)
return;
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists