[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZG_JuzyP_1FHIC6L@slm.duckdns.org>
Date: Thu, 25 May 2023 10:48:59 -1000
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Zqiang <qiang.zhang1211@...il.com>
Cc: jiangshanlai@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] workqueue: Do not set CPU_INTENSIVE worker flags with
wq_cpu_intensive_thresh_us=0
Hello,
I rewrote the patch description and separated it out into a separate if
statement for readability. Applied to wq/for-6.5.
Thanks.
>From 18c8ae813156a6855f026de80fffb91e1a28ab3d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Zqiang <qiang.zhang1211@...il.com>
Date: Thu, 25 May 2023 12:00:38 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] workqueue: Disable per-cpu CPU hog detection when
wq_cpu_intensive_thresh_us is 0
If workqueue.cpu_intensive_thresh_us is set to 0, the detection mechanism
for CPU-hogging per-cpu work item will keep triggering spuriously:
workqueue: process_srcu hogged CPU for >0us 4 times, consider switching to WQ_UNBOUND
workqueue: gc_worker hogged CPU for >0us 4 times, consider switching to WQ_UNBOUND
workqueue: gc_worker hogged CPU for >0us 8 times, consider switching to WQ_UNBOUND
workqueue: wait_rcu_exp_gp hogged CPU for >0us 4 times, consider switching to WQ_UNBOUND
workqueue: kfree_rcu_monitor hogged CPU for >0us 4 times, consider switching to WQ_UNBOUND
workqueue: kfree_rcu_monitor hogged CPU for >0us 8 times, consider switching to WQ_UNBOUND
workqueue: reg_todo hogged CPU for >0us 4 times, consider switching to WQ_UNBOUND
This commit therefore disables the CPU-hog detection mechanism when
workqueue.cpu_intensive_thresh_us is set to 0.
tj: Patch description updated and the condition check on
cpu_intensive_thresh_us separated into a separate if statement for
readability.
Signed-off-by: Zqiang <qiang.zhang1211@...il.com>
Can you please use your full name as in "FIRST_NAME LAST_NAME <EMAIL>" when
signing-off patches in the future?
Thanks.
--
tejun
Powered by blists - more mailing lists